Of course there is no "it's a missile, and anyone who thinks it's anything else is and idiot" crowd. /s
If your mind is willing to consider the plane explanation, here is one of the best threads:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2625121/posts?q=1&;page=1
If you are so inclined, read the whole thing and look at the pics and videos and come back and tell us what you think. If not, that's fine.
It tends to resemble every launch I’ve ever seen video and or pictures of from NASA. Or it’s one hell of an experimental plane. But unicorn farts are the most realistic explanation.
An excerpt:
The problem with the “Contrail Hypothesis” is the contrail itself. Being in the aviation industry, often I make it a point to observe aircraft in flight and attempt to identify the aircraft passing overhead. This contrail is all together different that the contrail made by your run of the mill commercial, or general aviation, aircraft.
The volume of vapor left behind this particular vehicle is a great deal larger than any “aircraft” I have observed in the past.
Watch the video again and pay close attention to the light cast upon the vapor trail from the setting sun. One can clearly determine three factors that distinguish this contrail from one left behind by an aircraft.
1) The diameter of the trail is quite a deal larger than one left behind a large aircraft, say a 747-400,
2) The density of the vapor trail is far beyond what is created by a large commercial aircraft, regardless of altitude, and
3) contrails produced by commercial aircraft tend to condense into two separate columns of vapor connected by a faint layer in between created by the trailing turbulence created by the engines.
This is clearly a missile launch, don’t be fooled by that “Man behind the curtain.”
26 posted on 11/10/2010 3:58:26 PM PST by AngryCapitalist (PUSH HAS NOW COME TO SHOVE!)