So you are calling fellow FReepers “insane” because they don’t agree with you.
So far we have a former Under Secretary of Defense who also doesn’t agree with you;
and the Jane’s expert;
and a number of military and ex-military who strongly don’t agree with you.
Are you so rude as to call them all “insane” too?
Seems rather insulting and also unnecessary to me.
And I was only politely trying to point out that on an Internet discussion board not much can be “proved” - this seems obvious.
Did you see the expert Robert Ellsworth say “Stupendous!!! Takes you breath away!!!”
Did you see Doug Richardson from Jane’s, and an Editor at that:
“Doug Richardson, the editor of Jane’s Missiles and Rockets examined the video for the Times of London and said he was left with little doubt.”
“It’s a solid propellant missile,” he told the Times. “You can tell from the efflux [smoke].”
Richardson said it could have been a ballistic missile launched from a submarine or an interceptor, the defensive anti-missile weapon used by Navy surface ships.
Robert Ellsworth said the identical, the very same thing too-— because one can clearly see that that is what these photos and this video show, amazingly and indeed unfortunately: a missile launch from offshore California.
Seems all the “proof” is on our side and all the sneering rudeness is on yours ...
Be fair, son. I only said "bordering on insane." But in your case I'm willing to make an exception.