Well said up until your last paragraph. Including the Los Angeles ‘missile’ in your argument only serves to weaken your position.
I've had many good writers criticize my writing which was intended to sell ideas in my corporation. They were usually correct. The usual mantra was "Senior managers may read half a page." Did you object to adding another theme, distracting from the essential notion of Obama’s illegitimacy? Do you have conflicting views of the significance of the apparent missile? Or did you not like the comparison with the Flight 800 imbroglio?
Bill Ayers candidly discused, as did Alinsky, the need to weaken trust in institutions the easier to replace them. Two retired Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs agree that Flight 800 was attacked. My point was that government knows that citizens have become accustomed to not knowing, either about threats, if it didn't affect them, or eligibility, if they don't understand the Constitution.
The claim by some is that the missile is a con trail. Having seen lots of missile launchings, albeit from some miles down range, and never seen a con-trail with a glow at its tail, or increasing velocity with altitude, I question the con-trail explaination, and know the government and military will do as they are told, lying if necessary to achieve the objective of the CinC. Knowing we have an illegal commander, with thousands of cadre embedded in our government, and not knowing who is guiding him, I consider a missile launch very serious. We may not have been able to detect a presumed submarine, while our Executive, through a committee, is proposing to take another 100 billion dollars from our defense budget. That launch could have been a demonstration by one of two countries (three if I include Israel, which has every reason to consider the current government a risk to their existence) that we are very vulnerable.
Does anyone doubt that Obama would capitulate if pressed? He has said to the whole world that we are profligate. His lieutenant, Van Jones, is more to the point. The Green Jobs Czar was quite public about his belief the GW Bush planned and executed 9/11. Obama didn't contradict him. Missile launches are worth paying attention to, and particularly important without a trustworthy Commander in Chief.
I've had many good writers criticize my writing which was intended to sell ideas in my corporation. They were usually correct. The usual mantra was "Senior managers may read half a page." Did you object to adding another theme, distracting from the essential notion of Obama’s illegitimacy? Do you have conflicting views of the significance of the apparent missile? Or did you not like the comparison with the Flight 800 imbroglio?
Bill Ayers candidly discused, as did Alinsky, the need to weaken trust in institutions the easier to replace them. Two retired Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs agree that Flight 800 was attacked. My point was that government knows that citizens have become accustomed to not knowing, either about threats, if it didn't affect them, or eligibility, if they don't understand the Constitution.
The claim by some is that the missile is a con trail. Having seen lots of missile launchings, albeit from some miles down range, and never seen a con-trail with a glow at its tail, or increasing velocity with altitude, I question the con-trail explaination, and know the government and military will do as they are told, lying if necessary to achieve the objective of the CinC. Knowing we have an illegal commander, with thousands of cadre embedded in our government, and not knowing who is guiding him, I consider a missile launch very serious. We may not have been able to detect a presumed submarine, while our Executive, through a committee, is proposing to take another 100 billion dollars from our defense budget. That launch could have been a demonstration by one of two countries (three if I include Israel, which has every reason to consider the current government a risk to their existence) that we are very vulnerable.
Does anyone doubt that Obama would capitulate if pressed? He has said to the whole world that we are profligate. His lieutenant, Van Jones, is more to the point. The Green Jobs Czar was quite public about his belief the GW Bush planned and executed 9/11. Obama didn't contradict him. Missile launches are worth paying attention to, and particularly important without a trustworthy Commander in Chief.