Posted on 11/10/2010 3:17:14 PM PST by saganite
I wonder if I'm the first to call it, the reported unexplained missile launch off the coast of California, was US Airways 808.
I did a lot of extrapolation of what flights could be at the right position (off the coast) at the right altitude (for contrail formation) and came down to two possibilities: UPS flight 902 (UPS902) or US Airways flight 808 (AWE808).
As I was researching tonight (24 hours later), I realized that today's AWE808 current position (at around 4:50pm) was almost the same as it was the day of the incident. I quickly pulled up a Newport Beach webcam and found tha (apparently) AWE808 was making an identical contrail, 24 hours later!
Compare the above webcam image to the KCBS footage:
The comparison is quite clear. A remarkably similar, less-hyped, contrail created by the same flight almost exactly 24 hours later!
So, based on that, and the flight track of AWE808 24 hours earlier, I believe the mysterious missile off the coast of California on November 8, 2010, was in fact the contrail of US Airways flight 808, a flight originating in Honolulu , HI (PHNL) and ending in Phoenix (KPHX).
(Excerpt) Read more at blog.bahneman.com ...
Well done!
It sure looks good but why did the FAA say nothing was on radar?
It sure makes a great distraction from important issues.
Sorry bu tyou are wrong and so are any other idiots proclaiming this misleading BS.
But Doug Richardson, the editor of Janes Missiles and Rockets, examined the video for the Times of London and said he was left with little doubt.
Its a solid propellant missile, he told the Times. You can tell from the efflux [smoke].
LINKY:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2625055/posts
But what does he know?
Because of the question asked.
People wanted to know if radar showed any fast moving missles fired from sea level in the area of Catalina Island.
If they asked if there was a commercial jet at 30,000 feet flying towards the coast from Hawaii, the FAA would have answered in the affirmative.

So, the Chicoms have been launching a missile every day, and we just finally discovered it?!
And now our lying government is saying it is a “commercial flight”?!
What a bunch of lying scumbags!
/s
>>It sure looks good but why did the FAA say nothing was on radar?<<
They didn’t. They said nothing “unknown” and at high speed was on radar.
Does the FAA have radar coverage out there?
If the govt says it was a plane then by god thats what it was.
You need sedation!
Is that an offer?
The FAA said there were no fast moving UNIDENTIFIED objects on radar. Obviously, a commercial flight would be an IDENTIFIED object.
And a corkscrew effect. A plane would be doing a barrel roll on its climb out.
It was a missile. You can see the exhaust flame toward the end of the video.
The guy is full of crap the contrail disapates rather quickly on a jet but the plum in the vieo lingers way way after.
Please God... make something else interesting happen, so we can all get past this silly story. Amen.
Inbound flight at sunset — makes good sense — and matches the original videos perfectly. Nicely done!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.