Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It was US Airways flight 808 ("missile" launch)
bahneman.com ^ | 2010-11-09 17:49 | bahneman

Posted on 11/10/2010 3:17:14 PM PST by saganite

I wonder if I'm the first to call it, the reported unexplained missile launch off the coast of California, was US Airways 808.

I did a lot of extrapolation of what flights could be at the right position (off the coast) at the right altitude (for contrail formation) and came down to two possibilities: UPS flight 902 (UPS902) or US Airways flight 808 (AWE808).

As I was researching tonight (24 hours later), I realized that today's AWE808 current position (at around 4:50pm) was almost the same as it was the day of the incident. I quickly pulled up a Newport Beach webcam and found tha (apparently) AWE808 was making an identical contrail, 24 hours later!

Photobucket

Compare the above webcam image to the KCBS footage:

Photobucket

The comparison is quite clear. A remarkably similar, less-hyped, contrail created by the same flight almost exactly 24 hours later!

So, based on that, and the flight track of AWE808 24 hours earlier, I believe the mysterious missile off the coast of California on November 8, 2010, was in fact the contrail of US Airways flight 808, a flight originating in Honolulu , HI (PHNL) and ending in Phoenix (KPHX).

(Excerpt) Read more at blog.bahneman.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: alaskaairlines225; californiamissile; contrail; missile; mysterymissile; photogeniccontrails; tinfoilbrigade; unusualjetcontrails
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

1 posted on 11/10/2010 3:17:16 PM PST by saganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: saganite

Well done!


2 posted on 11/10/2010 3:22:32 PM PST by Kahuna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite
It was a Global jet airliner, en route from London to New York on an uneventful afternoon in the year 1961, but now reported overdue and missing. By now searched for on land, sea, and air by anguished human beings, fearful of what they might find. But you and I know where she is; you and I know what has happened. So if some moment, any moment, you hear the sound of jet engines flying atop the overcast skies, engines that sound searching and lost; engines that sound hungry for fuel, shoot up a flare or do something. That would be Global 33 trying to get home, from the Twilight Zone.
3 posted on 11/10/2010 3:22:42 PM PST by Vaquero (BHO....'The Pretenda from Kenya')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

It sure looks good but why did the FAA say nothing was on radar?


4 posted on 11/10/2010 3:23:55 PM PST by rdl6989 (January 20, 2013- The end of an error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

It sure makes a great distraction from important issues.


5 posted on 11/10/2010 3:26:34 PM PST by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Sorry bu tyou are wrong and so are any other idiots proclaiming this misleading BS.

“But Doug Richardson, the editor of Jane’s Missiles and Rockets, examined the video for the Times of London and said he was left with little doubt.

“It’s a solid propellant missile,” he told the Times. “You can tell from the efflux [smoke].”

LINKY:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2625055/posts

But what does he know?


6 posted on 11/10/2010 3:27:24 PM PST by stockpirate ("......When the government fears the people you have liberty." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989
It sure looks good but why did the FAA say nothing was on radar?

Because of the question asked.

People wanted to know if radar showed any fast moving missles fired from sea level in the area of Catalina Island.

If they asked if there was a commercial jet at 30,000 feet flying towards the coast from Hawaii, the FAA would have answered in the affirmative.

7 posted on 11/10/2010 3:31:56 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

8 posted on 11/10/2010 3:33:04 PM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: saganite

So, the Chicoms have been launching a missile every day, and we just finally discovered it?!

And now our lying government is saying it is a “commercial flight”?!

What a bunch of lying scumbags!

/s


9 posted on 11/10/2010 3:34:31 PM PST by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

>>It sure looks good but why did the FAA say nothing was on radar?<<

They didn’t. They said nothing “unknown” and at high speed was on radar.


10 posted on 11/10/2010 3:36:04 PM PST by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Does the FAA have radar coverage out there?


11 posted on 11/10/2010 3:39:57 PM PST by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

If the govt says it was a plane then by god thats what it was.


12 posted on 11/10/2010 3:40:03 PM PST by hillarys cankles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: saganite

You need sedation!


13 posted on 11/10/2010 3:40:54 PM PST by Doc Savage (Stay Thirsty My Friend!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite
Or an American Airlines 757-200 headed to either Honolulu or Kahului, Hawaii http://i55.tinypic.com/atkck1.jpg
14 posted on 11/10/2010 3:42:13 PM PST by CALawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage

Is that an offer?


15 posted on 11/10/2010 3:42:15 PM PST by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989
It sure looks good but why did the FAA say nothing was on radar?

The FAA said there were no fast moving UNIDENTIFIED objects on radar. Obviously, a commercial flight would be an IDENTIFIED object.

16 posted on 11/10/2010 3:42:43 PM PST by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
“You can tell from the efflux [smoke].”

And a corkscrew effect. A plane would be doing a barrel roll on its climb out.

It was a missile. You can see the exhaust flame toward the end of the video.

17 posted on 11/10/2010 3:45:14 PM PST by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: saganite

The guy is full of crap the contrail disapates rather quickly on a jet but the plum in the vieo lingers way way after.


18 posted on 11/10/2010 3:45:56 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Please God... make something else interesting happen, so we can all get past this silly story. Amen.


19 posted on 11/10/2010 3:47:25 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Inbound flight at sunset — makes good sense — and matches the original videos perfectly. Nicely done!


20 posted on 11/10/2010 3:49:10 PM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson