Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
Posted on 11/09/2010 6:15:44 PM PST by rxsid
Think someone is starting to leak stuff? We just found out about a gay nanny too.
It’s there.
Hmmm. Interesting forehead and cheek structure similarities in the photo of what’s-his-name and his “half-sister.”
Notwithstanding the whole questionable lineage business, for a Phi Beta Kappa, zero Sr. sure can’t write worth a $#!t.
If Stanley could support herself somehow to go to UW, she should have had means to go to Cambridge, eh?
Not necessarily. There is such a thing as common law name change, i.e., change through consistent usage. It’s actually grounded in free speech. You can call yourself whatever you like. But the rules vary somewhat from state to state, such that a statute can specifically abrogate the power to effect common law name changes. One more caveat. If the name change was not innocent, i.e., was undertaken specifically to hide from a creditor or to avoid deportation, it doesn’t work.
He said his middle name is Steve.
Hmmm... I noticed that too.
Assuming this was true, in today's moral climate, what's the big deal? It's not Obama’s fault that his mommy & daddy weren't married. It might even get him some points with the pro-life crowd that mommy had him instead of aborting him.
I hear you about Occam's razor, but isn't the fiasco of a secret past more damaging that an unwed mother? Even Jesus had the stigma of an unwed mother for a little while, since Mary was pregnant THEN Joseph married her.
He already said (or had Bill Ayers say) in his book that he was dubious about his parents’ marriage. And missus 0thugga said to an audience that his mother was “very young and very single” when she dropped the fiend.
She could be lying or not, who knows. But he is definitely not hiding the marital status of his alleged parents. Whatever he is hiding is much, much bigger than that. Why would he hide every single freaking bit of paper from his entire life just if his parents weren’t married?
Nope, that’s not it.
mamma and Lolo and Barack sr were all in college together in Hawaii - BEFORE 1962
Barack, jr aka barry soetoro, was born in 1961...before he was a year old, mama took him with her to college in Washington state - no Barack Sr in site.
July 2008
0bama’s mama was very young and single when she had him according to Michelle 0bama:
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/07/10/1193601.aspx
Where the hell did they get THIS letter?
mamma and Lolo and Barack sr were all in college together in Hawaii - BEFORE 1962
So you claim, but what unidentified 'papers' supposedly show this? After all, I already linked to government documents that clearly claim that Lolo first came to the US in 1962.
The Hoover Institution has confirmed that it is a genuine copy from their archives, according to the WND article.
He ain’t the daddy.
Who be da baby-daddy???? Too much “stayin” going on.
Like I been saying, he is No-bama. Am thinking Ann baby couldn’t keep dem drawers on.
If they were never married the only way the child would have the last name of Obama is if the father signed an acknowledgement of paternity, in which case he would be listed on the BC as the father anyway. The marital status of the mother is in the confidential medical portion of the BC for 1961, which is only released when particularly requested, according to the HDOH Administrative Rules.
So unless his name is a total fabrication also, his BC would not show anything embarrassing. And if SAD and BHO were never married then the HDOH has been involved in blatant lies on this as well as the other lies they’ve done.
No matter how you slice it, it warrants an investigation because so many lies by government officials are involved.
Yeah. I want to know about that, or does the Pre-sent have his father's records sealed, or expunged, too?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.