He may have a point.
I love Sarah, and have given to her PAC...she can be just as effective as an opinion leader and backer of candidates even if she never holds office again.
Maybe she could be a Senator from Alaska someday. :)
Michael Reagan has every right to his opinion but this “polarizing” thing is ridiculous. Obama has more unfavorables then Sarah Palin has, is Obama “too polarizing” to the left..nope, to them he is not polarizing enough, he is not progressive enough. Then Shepard Smith brings on some ass clown who says that Sarah cost the GOP the Senate LOL I bust a gut laughing..really, she cost them the senate, did Sarah cost them the senate in 2006, where has this clown been living. She busts her ass for 2 years now and the majority of the candidates she endorsed won and that fool has the nerve to say she cost them the senate! He said that the GOP Establishment candidates could have won, well yippy to that, more establishment leftist candidates who will bow down and kiss Obama’s ring, yeah that is all we need
You moderate, slightly left of center republicans are so predictable. When Conservatives threaten to go third party you plead for us to stay and 'change' the party from within. So we start to change the party from within but now that's too "polarizing". Both you AND Michael 'nancy boy' Reagan can pound sand.