[kosciusko51]

I think they said the same thing about his dad...

[cripplecreek]

I personally don’t think she’ll run but will be the force that drives the winner to victory.

[kosciusko51]

Plus, Huck is a big-gov “compassionate conservative”

[Islander7]

He also said the Huckster would be a good choice. LOL! Not a chance!

[Undocumented_capitalist]

Sad but true.

[pissant]

ROFLMAO

[RC2]

I don’t think she wants to run anyway but she sure scares the hell out of the liberals. She’s of more use doing what she’s doing. People listen to her and she rattles the right cages.

[earlJam]

We can support her any way we can.

But it is still her responsibility to make herself electable to the rest of the population she would need to win.

She has yet to do that.

[r9etb]

Wait ... isn't that the same Michael Reagan that folks trot out as "proof" that St. Sarah is Ronald Reagan's heir?

Ah, well ... Michael Reagan must be just another RINO elitist after all.

[LaybackLenny]

*ping*

[FrankR]

POLARIZATION is good.

Without POLARIZATION a compass wouldn't work. No one would know which way the north POLE was.

There could be nothing magnetic without POLARIZATION.

There would be no Electricity without POLARIZATION.

Nancy Pelosi has been called "polarizing" as well. It's good that she's polarizing, we have a clear picture where she stands and it's not good for America.

Sarah Palin is also "polarizing", and we have a clear picture where she stands, FOR the good of America.

Without POLARIZATION we have no way to find direction, no clear way to tell the good from the bad.

Thank goodness for POLARIZAION...America's compass points toward Palin... and that's good.

[anita]

This despite Palin gave shout outs to him on many of her speeches. I think Sarah Palin is the ONLY Prez-candidate who could give nightmares to our corrupt journolistas.

[From The Deer Stand]

I get tired of all these political hacks - from both parties - and their “expert” opinion. The only experts are the people in the voting booth and that has been proven time and time again.

[Retired Greyhound]

He’s probably right, but I support her right now anyway.

However, if a more conservative/more electable candidate comes along I will give that person a serious look.

[Glenn]

Michael Reagan is absolutely correct.

[Jaidyn]

If she was a man, the same naysayers would brag how uniting ‘he’ is.

[Dr.Zoidberg]

Michael Reagan is flacking for governor nannystate hucklebum?

Wow. That says a lot about Michael Reagan, and none of it good. Again, wow.

[The Duke]

Ok, then, let’s just be happy winning the other 200 elections.

[Wolfstar]

Whatever happened to respecting the free speech rights of all, especially when we disagree with them politically? This tendency among self-professed “real” conservatives to try to enforce group think is very disturbing. Also, whatever happened to keeping an open mind until we see who throws their hats in the ring next year?

[bayouranger]

She simply needs someone to balance her in-between the Left’s Right-side & they’re done.

Done.