Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bobibutu
Love it when we have a technical article showing an image ninety degrees out of phase with the description.

The article is garbage. The picture itself is well known, and it shows known debris around the planet. Those are not limited to the geostationary orbit, and in fact - given the scale - only the LEO debris are shown. The geostationary orbit, being 22,236 miles above ground, would look like this:

There is still a valid concern that satellites at the graveyard orbit will be bombarded by space dust and larger meteorites and eventually that will result in either slowing down of the whole satellite or in chipping small pieces off; then those pieces can get into lower orbits. But the article talks about ridiculous things; did *any* editor at Space Daily even read this stuff? Do they allow anyone off the street to post anything they want?

4 posted on 11/08/2010 11:20:48 PM PST by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Greysard

It won’t be too long from now that we’ll be able to rendezvous with those sattelites, attach a small ion thruster, and send them on their way into deep sapace.


7 posted on 11/09/2010 4:01:43 AM PST by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson