Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Qbert

You are not a better candidate if you can’t win the primary.


5 posted on 11/08/2010 8:40:25 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kabar

“You are not a better candidate if you can’t win the primary.”

Don’t tell that to Karl Rove...


6 posted on 11/08/2010 8:43:45 PM PST by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: kabar
You are not a better candidate if you can’t win the primary.

Says it all, right there.

If Simmons or Schiff were better candidates, one would've won the primary.

If Castle were a better candidate, he'd have won the primary. Same goes for Norton, Lowden, Tarkanian, et al

You can even go one step further: If Romney or Huckabee were better candidates, they'd have beaten McCain in the primary. And, since they couldn't defeat the weakest candidate the GOP has offered since Alf Landon, they've got no business mucking up the field in 2012.

11 posted on 11/08/2010 8:53:22 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson