Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Simmons and Schiff: We were better Senate candidates than McMahon (Connecticut)
CT Post ^ | 11/6/2010 | Brian Lockhart & Neil Vigdor

Posted on 11/08/2010 8:26:59 PM PST by Qbert

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 11/08/2010 8:27:04 PM PST by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Qbert

He also never kicked a man in the groin for entertainment...

Well, hell, that’s my guy !!!


2 posted on 11/08/2010 8:29:37 PM PST by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Never could understand why Coulter wouldn’t endorse Schiff.


3 posted on 11/08/2010 8:35:24 PM PST by GoodDay (Palin for POTUS 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
In one sentence, Ann Coulter pretty much summed everything up.

And Linda McMahon, wasn't even a tea party candidate, this made nooooo sense.

4 posted on 11/08/2010 8:35:33 PM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

You are not a better candidate if you can’t win the primary.


5 posted on 11/08/2010 8:40:25 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

“You are not a better candidate if you can’t win the primary.”

Don’t tell that to Karl Rove...


6 posted on 11/08/2010 8:43:45 PM PST by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M

Yeah it did. She could self finance. As a rule The big boys at the GOP love candidates that can sink millions of their own into a race. The only exception I can think of right now just became Govenor of Florida. In his case he had a contagion though. The Tea Party backed him. They’d have loved him if not for that.

I don’t mind Linda’s past. Elites take exception to it but I see no shame in the wrestling business. I just find it amazing the GOP because of their unquenchable thrist for filthy rich self financing candidates would overlook they were running a white women connected to a blue collar sport/entertainment in a northeast state. If the Tea Parties had rallied to her banner she’s have been splashed all over SNL and denounced by the establishment as an embarrassment. yet silence from the same establishment that wants to focus on O’Donnell. No word at all about their brilliant choices.


7 posted on 11/08/2010 8:46:05 PM PST by Soul Seeker ( I was there when we had the numbers, but didnÂ’t have the principles.---Jim that leans conservDeMin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

All candidates who have a lot of baggage from their previous life are going to get drawn off message and have to spend way more time playing defense and talking about that crap than they would like. Some manage to win despite this handicap but we’ve seen others who could not.


8 posted on 11/08/2010 8:47:48 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Primaries are for the little people, you know, the voters. Honestly, how could anyone have won in CT? They voted for a guy who out and out lied about serving in Vietnam and was an absolute dud in every debate. Bottom line, if Blumenthal had died in the middle of the campaign, he still would have won.


9 posted on 11/08/2010 8:48:40 PM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

CT is populated with old money lib elitists, entertainment types who work in NYC and Wall Street bailout babys.

The demographics of the state make it hard for a Repub to win no matter what the circumstances.


10 posted on 11/08/2010 8:50:42 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar
You are not a better candidate if you can’t win the primary.

Says it all, right there.

If Simmons or Schiff were better candidates, one would've won the primary.

If Castle were a better candidate, he'd have won the primary. Same goes for Norton, Lowden, Tarkanian, et al

You can even go one step further: If Romney or Huckabee were better candidates, they'd have beaten McCain in the primary. And, since they couldn't defeat the weakest candidate the GOP has offered since Alf Landon, they've got no business mucking up the field in 2012.

11 posted on 11/08/2010 8:53:22 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

“The demographics of the state make it hard for a Repub to win no matter what the circumstances.”

Yep- although Malloy only won the governor’s race by 6,000 votes.


12 posted on 11/08/2010 8:56:15 PM PST by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Schiff would have been one of the best in the Senate. He’s the kind of person we need in any office right now.


13 posted on 11/08/2010 9:01:58 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

The GOP should stay away from celebutainment candidates... like Donald Trump


14 posted on 11/08/2010 9:01:58 PM PST by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Yes, one constant with all the loser Senate candidates - COD, McMahon, Fiorina - they never held elective office... and Ken Buck held only a minor office.

The winners - Toomey, Rubio, Kirk, Portman,etc. - all held office before.

Given that, we were more likely to win with Simmons in CT, Mike Castle in DE, and ... Chuck Devore in CA. (!)


15 posted on 11/08/2010 9:02:44 PM PST by WOSG (OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

Interesting point- definitely is a strong correlation there. (Although Angle held office before and lost).


16 posted on 11/08/2010 9:06:42 PM PST by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Anyone can toss their hat into the ring in 2012 and probably will. Reagan lost to Ford in 1976. He took another shot in 1980.


17 posted on 11/08/2010 9:09:35 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

Rand Paul is an exception.


18 posted on 11/08/2010 9:24:07 PM PST by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

They are both useless for statewide office in Connecticut.
Simmons = NARAL
Schiff = comedy hour

“in a hierarchy, everyone tends to rise to their level of incompetence”.


19 posted on 11/08/2010 9:36:09 PM PST by campaignPete R-CT ("pray without ceasing" - Paul of Tarsus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
I honestly didn't have a problem with her being in the wrestling business, though, to be blunt, she, to put it nicely, embellished a bit, her particular role in the WWF/WWEs rise up.

She simply wasn't a good candidate, and well before she ever even hinted at running for office, I honestly didn't think she was that smart.

She was a bad choice, I knew it then, but your right, if she had been a tea party person, she would have gotten the same bad wrap as O'Donnell.

20 posted on 11/08/2010 10:06:41 PM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson