Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki
Anyone who heard or read O’s speech in the Indian parliament never heard of a veto for an Indian seat other than this author.

"And as two global leaders, the United States and India can partner for global security-especially as India serves on the Security Council over the next two years. Indeed, the just and sustainable international order that America seeks includes a United Nations that is efficient, effective, credible and legitimate. That is why I can say today-in the years ahead, I look forward to a reformed U.N. Security Council that includes India as a permanent member.

If you are a permanent member of the UN Security Council, you have a veto.

15 posted on 11/08/2010 8:08:57 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: kabar

Umm no. That’s precisely the reason why the UNSC hasn’t been expanded. The P-5 have been ok with expansion in general, but not on veto powers, which is why the G-4 bloc (India/Germany/Japan/Brazil) haven’t accepted overtures.


17 posted on 11/08/2010 8:10:45 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: kabar

Permanent membership in a reformed UNSC doesn’t mean an automatic veto. Obama and his crew were smart enough to avoid that.

http://www.dnaindia.com/world/report_india-for-compromise-solution-on-veto-power-in-unsc-reforms_1407339

http://www.nigeriavillagesquare.com/articles/laolu-akande/shocker-au-drops-ball-on-nigeria-safricas-un-council-reform-plans.html


19 posted on 11/08/2010 8:13:12 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson