Replies

I would expect a physician to know what projection meant.

As far as the use of personal pronouns, in your post that I’m responding to you use four of them.

You evidently don’t understand “personal pronouns” either.

And no, I don’t care what you believe, because you are incorrect. Anchor babies can’t be president — even if it isn’t “fair” and offends your liberal sensibilities.

I said that it was hardly inappropriate for me to use personal pronouns, meaning that it is acceptable. Hardly inappropriate =|= appropriate . And, yes, you were projecting, because your post expressing disbelief about anchor babies actually being natural-born U.S. citizens was hardly normative. Obviously I'm going to use words like "should" and "want" when I'm expressing a personal viewpoint. I hate having to use the passive voice -- do you really want to read an entire post comprised of statements beginning with "it should be said that..."

I realize that my posts over the past couple of days have contained some pretty egregious spelling and grammatical errors. I don't believe in spell check and I've done two 12 hour moonlights since Monday, so I'm sorry if the posts aren't up to your lofty standards. Cut me some slack. Or don't.

Is it likely that an anchor baby will be elected President someday? No, but then again that isn’t the issue. It is possible because they are eligible to be elected to the Presidency once they reach age 35.