Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye

I see you didn’t really address my point. You just cited a bunch of 19th century cases, half of which came before the 14th amendment so they are completely irrelevant. Throw out 1814, 1830, 1856, and 1863. The 14th wasn’t passed until 1868 and if any of those pre-1868 cases had some two-parent requirement for U.S. citizenship, the 14th trumps them all.


103 posted on 11/08/2010 11:03:44 PM PST by VADoc1980
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: VADoc1980

“the 14th trumps them all.”

It doesn’t rewrite the CONSTITUTION....lol


106 posted on 11/08/2010 11:05:44 PM PST by Lower55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

To: VADoc1980

I already addressed the 14th Amendment and your misunderstanding of it. I’m amazed that you keep throwing out court decisions and judicial opinions based on their date and the life status of those who made them. That is new. I guess the entire Constitution is irrelevant on that basis. lol


112 posted on 11/08/2010 11:10:31 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson