Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Actually Obama, the tea party doesn’t care a whit about Romney’s healthcare or yours. But the difference is the Romney care is in one state who has the right to decide what they want. Obamacare is not of that model. Instead it follows the dictatorial, unconstitutional model.


16 posted on 11/08/2010 5:12:47 PM PST by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hattie

Actually, they DO care about intrusive big government programs that take our freedoms away. Don’t kid yourself in anyway that Mitt can be nominated and not anchored with the precursor to Obamacare. They used the MASS law as a test study for it nationally!


22 posted on 11/08/2010 5:29:04 PM PST by Soul Seeker ( I was there when we had the numbers, but didnÂ’t have the principles.---Jim that leans conservDeMin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Hattie
“Actually Obama, the tea party doesn’t care a whit about Romney’s healthcare or yours. But the difference is the Romney care is in one state who has the right to decide what they want. Obamacare is not of that model. Instead it follows the dictatorial, unconstitutional model.”

I agree this is a critical difference. States should have the authority to decide what they want. This is the strength of our union. If I don't want to live with the laws of my State, I can choose from 49 others. This is antithetical to what Obama wants. Obama actively fights this concept on every front, even to the extent of suing entire States (Arizona).

FUBO

33 posted on 11/08/2010 8:09:34 PM PST by Gabrial (The Whitehouse Nightmare will continue as long as the Nightmare is in the Whitehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson