Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
Isn’t the decision to not file a response also a legal decision in and of itself? A decision that would be made by Kagan?

There are literally hundreds of cases a month where someone files a cert. petition and the government doesn't respond. I doubt that the Solicitor General herself, as opposed to some low-level lawyer in her office, reviews every single one of them.

60 posted on 11/08/2010 4:28:53 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian
There are literally hundreds of cases a month where someone files a cert. petition and the government doesn't respond. I doubt that the Solicitor General herself, as opposed to some low-level lawyer in her office, reviews every single one of them.

That wouldn't fly. Ultimately, the Solicitor General's name gets placed on the Supreme court docket as we see below in this example. Delegated authority is no excuse or is it excepted to shirk accountability.


- - - - - - -


No. 09-724
Title:
The Real Truth About Obama, Inc., Petitioner
v.
Federal Election Commission, et al.
Docketed: December 22, 2009
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
  Case Nos.: (08-1977)
  Decision Date: August 5, 2009
  Rehearing Denied: October 6, 2009

~~~Date~~~  ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 16 2009 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 21, 2010)
Jan 11 2010 Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 22, 2010.
Feb 17 2010 Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 24, 2010.
Mar 24 2010 Brief of respondents Federal Election Commission, et al. filed.
Apr 2 2010 Reply of petitioner The Real Truth About Obama, Inc. filed.
Apr 7 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 23, 2010.
Apr 26 2010 Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Citizens United v. Federal Election Comm'n, 558 U.S. ___ (2010) and the Solicitor General's suggestion of mootness.
May 28 2010 JUDGMENT ISSUED.



~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~    ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
James Bopp Jr. Bopp, Coleson & Bostrom (812) 232-2434
1 South Sixth Street
Terre Haute, IN  47807-3510
jboppjr@aol.com
Party name: The Real Truth About Obama, Inc.
Attorneys for Respondents:
Elena Kagan Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC  20530-0001
SupremeCtBriefs@USDOJ.gov
Party name: Federal Election Commission, et al.

65 posted on 11/08/2010 4:39:39 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson