Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Free ThinkerNY
Maybe I'm on crack, but I fail to see how we would have been better off with a 52-48 Senate trying to appease the Northeast Liberal Cabal. At least now we can reasonably be expected (in a perfect world) to hold a filibuster without needing to going hat-in-hand to those who would do us harm! Committee chairs and assignments aside, this takes away one of the Dems key points of blame for the next cycle.
63 posted on 11/08/2010 11:54:15 AM PST by Sursam Abordine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sursam Abordine

>> I fail to see how we would have been better off with a 52-48 Senate trying to appease the Northeast Liberal Cabal <<

Because with a 52-48 or 51-49 ‘Pub senate, the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee would be Jeff Sessions. As it is, we’re stuck with Pat Leahy for another two years’ worth of Obama judicial nominees and Justice Department antics. That’s all I need to know.


76 posted on 11/08/2010 12:05:43 PM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson