Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hoagy62
Oh, no doubt Obama would be finished in that case. But the damage to the country's reputation would be temendous. think about this...Iran nukes NYC. Over 1 million killed instantly on a weekday afternoon; many more soon to die. Obama refuses to retaliate after it is shown for a fact that the missile was launched by the Iranians. A battle ensues with Biden, NORAD and SAC general officers, heck even the Secret Service and Speaker Boehner are caught up in the chaos of trying to get a military response off the ground. Remember how long that took on 9/11?

By the time Obama is removed from office (after SCOTUS gets into the mix), it's the next day. Now what? Nuke Tehran? a day later. The UN and every non-ally would accuse us of war crimes. Our weakness would embolden every terrorist on Earth.

63 posted on 11/08/2010 12:35:23 PM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: buccaneer81
So the response would need to be immediate, or it would have no legitimacy?

Our response to 9/11 wasn't immediate, and yes, the world accused us of war crimes. So, should we need to respond to a nuking of an American city a bit late, we do the 'American thing'...tell them to STFU and take Tehran down to glowing fused bedrock.

(Yes, it sounds crazy and vindictive. I guess I've gotten tired of the rest of the world telling us what to do.)

65 posted on 11/08/2010 12:43:29 PM PST by hoagy62 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson