I didn’t see it mentioned in the article, but do we know why they changed their mind from the agreed upon number of 8 to 5 - seemingly without telling anyone?
Seems to me if they agreed upon 8 then 8 should have gone in, and if there was a problem then it should have been brought to our attention beforehand.
Because we are guests there should we have just let it go and sent in 5? I think I’m a little more disappointed with India and their lack of consideration for a visiting country.
Maybe I’m missing something.
This doesn’t take away from the fact the Gibbs is an idiot.
*the = that Gibbs is an idiot.
Sorry.