Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gates urges Congress to repeal gay ban now
AP ^ | 11/07/10 | Anne Gearan

Posted on 11/07/2010 12:15:43 AM PDT by Rastus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261 next last
To: Responsibility2nd

The paranoid smell trolls everywhere.


181 posted on 11/08/2010 1:51:33 PM PST by WAW (Which enumerated power?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

I would never contend the Constitution is secondary to the Creator. That’s putting words in my mouth.

It’s secondary in the narrower legal sense. The judge had no jurisdiction. How hard is that to figure? How hard is that to support?


182 posted on 11/08/2010 1:54:43 PM PST by WAW (Which enumerated power?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Lone Red Ranger; WAW; metmom; trisham; BykrBayb; xzins; P-Marlowe; wmfights; DJ MacWoW; ...
Well he is on this thread saying that he doesn't care about homosexuals in the military and applauding Gates for pushing to allow open homosexuality in the military.

As for the personal attacks, I opined that he might be a retread troll and I stand by that. ALL of the personal attacks have been from WAW.

But what I find even more interesting is YOUR posting history. Prior to this thread you had made ONE post on September 22nd, 2010 (a few days after WAW joined), but before that your most recent post was in 2005 and many of the posts you made back then were to since-banned trolls.

So, who pinged YOU to this thread? Sure, you've got a 2005 sign-up date, but the reality is that you've made just over a hundred posts total and aside from one post a month and a half ago, your total FR history was in the summer of 2005.

183 posted on 11/08/2010 1:58:48 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: WAW

Be honest.

What WAS your FR name before you were zotted?


184 posted on 11/08/2010 2:04:09 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (Yes, as a matter of fact, what you do in your bedroom IS my business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I didn’t say I don’t care about homosexuals in the military!

Just said that the case to be made is a Constitutional case, one that Congress can address.


185 posted on 11/08/2010 2:04:26 PM PST by WAW (Which enumerated power?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: WAW; wagglebee
The gays shouldn’t serve because they’re gay argument...Much harder to be persuasive. Not that its incorrect, not because there aren’t very real issues with separate housing, logistics... not because there aren’t certain very real obstacles to making it happen, not because it’s inaccurate in any way...but much less persuasive because there’s a lot of room for emotion and nuance and other means for the Left to place their wedges.

A. Insulting wagglebee shows your true colors.

B. The ban on homosexuals which used to be standard (now watered down to DADT) has to do with behavior. Not self-identified "gays". A practitioner of same sex sodomy is, by behavior, prone to promsicuity, violence, risk taking, high disease rates and so on. Why should people who practice unhealthy and unnatural sex acts be allowed in the military? There is no reason other than leftist/political correctness/surrender to deviancy.

We lost on the DADT argument 20 years ago. This is the world we live in now.

Another way of saying to women who might get raped - "if it's inevitable, lie back and enjoy it". An excuse for giving up and letting evil win. As though history is an inevitable path to hell ("progress") and anyone disagreeing with the current direction is "living in the past", "trying to turn back the clock", etc. Typical leftist, moral relativist [sic] arguments. You have not one scintilla of a clue of what it means to be a conservative.

186 posted on 11/08/2010 2:04:29 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Tell it to Mark Levin.


187 posted on 11/08/2010 2:05:43 PM PST by WAW (Which enumerated power?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: WAW
The paranoid smell trolls everywhere.

Au contraire, sensible people recognize leftist idiots when they speak or write.

188 posted on 11/08/2010 2:05:43 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Yep. Sensible people.


189 posted on 11/08/2010 2:06:31 PM PST by WAW (Which enumerated power?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I said upthread....

I think you’re (WAW) a re-tread troll. I’m sure you know by now that Wagglebee is responsible for outing more trolls here at FR than anyone I know.

And now I do believe Wagglebee is going for a twofer here today, folks.

Exposing not one BUT two Trolls.

Way to go Wagglebee!


190 posted on 11/08/2010 2:07:15 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (Yes, as a matter of fact, what you do in your bedroom IS my business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: WAW

Why should I care what Mark Levin says about anything?


191 posted on 11/08/2010 2:08:55 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Exposing not one BUT two Trolls.

I'm thinking that there's a good chance that it's one troll with two names.

192 posted on 11/08/2010 2:09:03 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

I think he made the same case to his audience of millions of active conservatives when the judge’s ruling came out. The Gate’s statement wouldn’t change that.


193 posted on 11/08/2010 2:11:18 PM PST by WAW (Which enumerated power?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I think they are one and the same.


194 posted on 11/08/2010 2:11:42 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: WAW

You’re not clear about what point Levin made.

If he agrees with me, fine. If he doesn’t, he’s wrong.

Simple.

And if he’s wrong, and has millions of (all kinds) listeners, so what?

Millions voted for 0bastard.


195 posted on 11/08/2010 2:13:09 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I like it (upthread) where he said.....
 
I know this guy. He’s solid. And he has been around as long as I have, if that’s anything to ya.
 
I'd be willing to bet he knows this guy a lot more than he is letting on. I'd be willing to be they share the same birthday. And they even live in the same town.

lololol

Probably went to school together. "if that’s anything to ya...."

lolol

One troll - Two screen names. That counts as a twofer zot as far as I'm concerned.

 

196 posted on 11/08/2010 2:17:32 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (Yes, as a matter of fact, what you do in your bedroom IS my business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I'm thinking that there's a good chance that it's one troll with two names.

The mods are pretty good about not allowing one ISP address to have 2 screen names.

You could ping one if you believe it to be so.

As for gays serving openly in the military, I vote NO!

197 posted on 11/08/2010 2:18:00 PM PST by airborne (Why is it we won't allow the Bible in school, but we will in prison? Think about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

This gets curiouser and curiouser.....


198 posted on 11/08/2010 2:20:04 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: airborne; Admin Moderator

The mods are pretty good about not allowing one ISP address to have 2 screen names.

You could ping one if you believe it to be so.

____________________________________________________________

Well I think I’ll just do that.

Hey mods. Take a lookie at this thread. I believe Waggleebee has found one troll with two screen names.

Zot at will.


199 posted on 11/08/2010 2:27:26 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (Yes, as a matter of fact, what you do in your bedroom IS my business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd; 50mm; Old Sarge; darkwing104

Unless he’s in his mother’s basement with two computers and remote access for one.

But then again, the mods have a way of sniffing out trolls based on posting style.

IBTZ

IBTZ


200 posted on 11/08/2010 2:34:27 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson