Posted on 11/06/2010 8:21:47 PM PDT by SmartInsight
The action of Obama, Pelosi, Reid will cost the Democrats dearly in 2012. Democrats and Obama's administration needs to explain why it is so radical for Tea Party movement to want the federal government to tax less, spend less, balance the budget, secure the borders, and leave more authority to American People, local and state governments.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
Phase II of “We the People Take Their Country Back” has begun. We’ve regrouped and reloaded.
Let them try to go on as of the election meant nothing at all, as Scary Harry came out and said the day after the election that those making 250K/yr. would have their tax cuts expire, come hell or high water. Let them elect Pelosi as their leader. Let them continue to not listen to the electorate. I dare them.
They will pay for it while guaranteeing Obama sevres only one term. Then we can happily go about dismantling their progressive empire piece by piece, brick by brick, with nothing standing in the way.
Everytime I see an article with a title like this I say to myself, "2012 is a long way off". Anything can happen. After 1994 and impeachment, a lot of people wrote the Great Stainmaker off. Look what happened.
We may have the House, but Hussain still has the Senate , he's one nominee away from the SCOTUS and he'll always have the media and academia. The GOP has about an 8 month window IMHO to show something and to get their message out to the great uninformed masses. Because we [Freepers] are tuned into talk radio, the Internet and we're political junkies we take for granted that people understand things and think logically. Being a union member and working with other union members you'd be shocked at how many people still think Zer0 is giving us FREE HEALTHCARE and how many blame the insurance companies profiteering for the increases in their health insurance and the cost of gasoline.
Don't get me wrong, I'm thrilled at the election results, but as Beck , Rush , Levin etc say , "Now the real work begins."
2010 is just the dress rehearsal.. 2012 is opening nite..
It’s already cost them in 2010.
The Republicans did not win control of the Senate along with control of the House, and have no recourse to Presidential veto. The battle may haveactually been lost in 2008 simply due to ignorance, as the deteriorating financial condition of the US may not allow elections of 2012 to be productive if there is nothing left for a Republican win to do by that time.
World responses to the smallest of financial events are almost instantaneous, and at the latest in one or two days. Much of the future is priced in before the fact. The Fed has now declared by deed to the world that it is no longer independent and seeks advisement from anywhere, even as it has been given control of the entire US populations financial management through the Consumer Financial Protection Act via the creation of the Bureau of COnsumer Financial Protection. As the Fed goes, so we go, as we are locked inside the Fed now as citizens by the “excellent” judgement of the Democrat Party.
Bernanke and the world have noted the Fed is in uncharted, uncontrollable territory, and the population of the US has been given over to the Fed for manipulation and control??!!
The media has somehow missed the significance of this.
2012 is impossibly far away in financial terms and what will avail as constructive possibility cannot be reliably predicted from this point in time at all. For example, Europe could easily collapse before 2012 and take us with it. UK right now is liquidating its military infrastructure, govt buildings and public works projects. Ireland is close behind. Greece, Portugal, Spain ready to go. 2012 seems so close and is yet so....far.
Gee that’s a real good way of fomenting job growth, by taxing the he$$ out of the class of people who provide most of the jobs.
Hss! Hsss! Hsssssssssssss!
I was throwing down the gauntlet, daring them not to listen. I do not support their policies.
Strategically, it is better for the Republicans to NOT have won the Senate this year.
In 2 years, it will be more clear for those that don’t understand.
damn right...
According to this politician, having 70% of your assets left is worse than having 0%. Of course I'm putting words in his mouth by characterizing a future promise as being 0% of the money I've contributed, but you get the idea.
If W's plan for SS reform had been implemented a couple years after it was proposed (there would have been some ramp-up time) participants would be sitting pretty right now since they would have invested much of their money in a deeply discounted market.
I’m speaking to Reid, of course.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.