Um, I never equated ‘murder’ and ‘public school.’
I was replying to someone who had quoted someone who had.
Hence the ‘>’ marks; to keep track of where in the conversation things were.
I didn’t mean to imply it was your position - was more or less agreeing with you, and tacking on further opinions.
I should have mentioned the source of the quote, though, so it didn’t look like your quote; sorry.