Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/05/2010 4:47:31 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: tobyhill

Ha!! The Tea Party eloped with American Conservatism... time for the GOP to face facts.


2 posted on 11/05/2010 4:55:50 AM PDT by SMARTY ("..discover what your enemy fears most by observing the means he uses to frighten you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill


3 posted on 11/05/2010 4:56:31 AM PDT by Diogenesis ('Freedom is the light of all sentient beings.' - Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill


4 posted on 11/05/2010 4:58:01 AM PDT by Diogenesis ('Freedom is the light of all sentient beings.' - Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
The tea party has within its grasp the power to push for instant runoff elections for public offices, all across the land, i.e. to make it legal and feasible to ever vote for a third party candidate, i.e. to break the duopoly of power of the demopublican party. That is, to set the stage for a brilliant day in which the choice on ballots is tea vs republican, and the demoKKKrat party is an ugly memory.

This should be part and parcel of a Voters Bill of Rights which we desperately need. To me at least such a bill would look more or less as follows:

The first item of such a bill HAS TO BE runoff elections or instant runoff elections for all public offices. Nobody should ever fear to vote his first choice, at least on a first ballot, and nobody should ever hold any public office with less than 50% of the vote.

There should also be a None-Of-Above choice on all ballots for public office and if that choice ever wins, then the other candidates should be barred for life from holding any public office and the parties sponsoring them should be barred for at least ten years from sponsoring candidates for that particular office. The penalty for running dead wood for public offices should be severe.

Another item on such a voters' bill of rights should be something which would eliminate voting fraud for all time and if that means getting rid of the secret ballot or at least limiting it somehow or other, so be it, we're paying too high a price for it. Somehow or other it has to be possible to check up on votes when there are questions or evidence of fraud.

There should be a provision that when a president is impeached and removed, his VP goes out the door with him and the office is either vacant until the next election or an emergency election is held to fill the office for the remainder of the current term. Granted removing a president should be difficult but it should not be impossible and if we couldn't remove Slick, we'd not have been able to remove Hitler or Nero either.

What happened in 98/99 was that Trent Lott simply refused to hand the presidency over to Algor with a year to go on Slick's second term, for obvious reasons. The situation should not be possible.

A person should need to be a US citizen for 18 years before voting in a US election. It should not be possible for a rogue political party to rule our land by simply importing large voting blocks for itself.

There should also be some mechanism to prevent utterly unqualified people from holding high offices. Certainly a candidate for president or vice president, or for US Senator or member of the House of Representatives should need to obtain the same basic and simple secret level security clearance which anybody would need to be a guard at the gate of any military base in our land. That isn't asking for much but it would have spared us from the last two democrat presidents.

There are a few other things you'd want but that's the main gist of it. There is also a question as to the extent the people should be voting on issues directly since we now have the technology to allow that while the founding fathers did not. You could get some of these evil social issues settled once and for all and out of politics, and you could limit the scope for corruption and bribery by letting the people themselves settle at least some kinds of issues.

6 posted on 11/05/2010 5:14:19 AM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

Is there a final tally of how Tea Party candidates did—House, Senate, state legislatures, governors? I saw one on NBC or CBS and I thought the way they calculated them was...curious. Can’t recall offhand why, but would be interested in seeing the numbers if anyone can post them.


7 posted on 11/05/2010 5:27:11 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 ( Mm, your tears are so yummy and sweet!Oh, the tears of unfathomable sadness! Mm-yummy! --E. Cartman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

GO MICHELE!!!!!


9 posted on 11/05/2010 5:43:08 AM PDT by madmominct
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

Bachmann is a Republican member of the House, and has as much right to run for a leadership position as anyone else. The New York Times could care less about Republican leadership in the House. They’re down on their knees praying for conflict among Republicans.


12 posted on 11/05/2010 6:32:56 AM PDT by popdonnelly (Class warfare is Obama's thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
I could stand replacing Rove with Russo.
13 posted on 11/05/2010 6:51:29 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson