Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kingattax

Nah, don’t take the bait. Notice that it is mostly liberals who float around this issue? I don’t think impeaching him would do any good for us. It’ll just make him a martyr; look at how it worked for Clinton. We need to reverse his policies and take away his ability to make new dangerous policies by de-fund. Another way perhaps to push for stronger BC requirements.


3 posted on 11/05/2010 3:32:19 AM PDT by paudio (The differences between Clinton and 0bama? About a dozen former Democratic Congressmen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: paudio

They won’t impeach Obama, regardless of how bad things get. Just like Clinton, the Senate won’t go along with it and the media will defend him at all costs. It will result in another Democratic rally in elections.

We just have to acknowledge (unless Don Imus) that Obama is a truly sick and twisted self-centered hack who will destroy our country because of things his sick and twisted father and mentors.


10 posted on 11/05/2010 3:40:38 AM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: paudio

Exactly. Just make Ø irrelevant. It would be the worst thing that could happen to him.


35 posted on 11/05/2010 4:16:02 AM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: paudio
" Nah, don’t take the bait. Notice that it is mostly liberals who float around this issue? I don’t think impeaching him would do any good for us. It’ll just make him a martyr; look at how it worked for Clinton. We need to reverse his policies and take away his ability to make new dangerous policies by de-fund. Another way perhaps to push for stronger BC requirements. "

BS.... it didn't help the Democrats or Clinton at all, there was a Republican President who won in 2000...
The Republicans only lost 2 seats in the House in 2000, and the Democrats only gained 1 seat in the House....
The reason why Republicans in Congress didn't do well in 2000 had nothing to do with Bill Clinton's impeachment, besides, Bill Clinton could not run again in 2000 anyway, so ? how could that have helped Bill Clinton ? ...
The Democrats didn't win the Presidency until 8 years later, 2008... and the Democrats didn't take back Congress until 2006, where as ? the Republicans themselves where to blame for the lose, not Bill Clinton's impeachment.
48 posted on 11/05/2010 4:38:14 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: paudio; All

No...you investigate his underling progressives who are doing the dirty work therebye isolating Obama from ever really being effective...then you hang Obama around the liberals’ necks like a flaming tire “necklace”(kenyan style) in 2012!


70 posted on 11/05/2010 5:59:51 AM PDT by mdmathis6 (True enlightenment occurs when one discovers just how much like God, one is NOT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson