the position of Democraps, RINOs, and the world’s “human rights” farce is that if there were twenty nuclear warheads in twenty cities ready to go off, it would be immoral to waterboard one jihad scumbag to get info in time to head off the plot
millions could die, just so long as we don’t waterboard one KSM
it’s long past time to make it clear what the liberal position really is on terrorism and ‘interrogations’
But I strongly suspect that if a Democrat President approved those exact interrogation techniques against terrorists in the nuke scenario you outlined and it worked to foil the plot, he'd be hailed as a hero by the same bunch who are now pushing to prosecute Bush.
>> it’s long past time to make it clear what the liberal position really is on terrorism and ‘interrogations’
As always, rigid adherence to ideology is their way. The ideology is far more important than any human life or a million lives.
For example, they say violence is bad...and therefore, if anyone starts any, let ‘em! If someone tries to kill you, let ‘em! Fighting is BAD! No distinction for self-defense, or deciding who’s right and wrong in a dispute that escalates to violence.
They like to think of themselves as subtle and nuance-rich, but they’re primitive, concrete-for-brains people.