LOL. I’ve posted on FR since 2001, and I don’t work for Disney, so if you can’t handle a discussion based on facts, you should forego the smarmy response, newbie.
The sad fact is, the gay community could decide to hold a Gay Days week at the “Holy Land Experience” theme park in Orlando, and there wouldn’t be a dang thing the park could do about it. Would that then make the Holy Land Experience deserving of a conservative boycott?
Disney likewise has no workable and legal means to resolve this problem, but if you have a solution, I’m sure they’d love to hear from you. What do you suggest?
For 13 years, Disney and Gay Days organizers have had an "unofficial" relationship in which the Disney execs, without publicly endorsing Gay Days, have bent over backwards to make sure the accommodations fit the needs of those participating in the gala.
One thing is fundamentally clear from any visit to the Gay Days site -- Disney's name, image, and likeness is littered throughout the site. Enter the Tinkerbell technicality. Disney will not expressly embrace Gay Days, for it knows the backlash would be too severe. So Disney just sits idly by and uses the Gay Day folks as a marketing conduit to the homosexual community. Disney gets the best of both worlds -- a technical denial of involvement in Gay Days, and the free advertising to scores of homosexuals.
Families should stay away from theme parks that openly cater to perverts. Your defense of the Disney name struck me as odd.