Because Bysiewicz is dumber than a pile of rocks. My apologies to rocks for equating them with the dumbass Connecticut SoS.
Yes, that is an affront to rocks. :)
The pile of rocks postponed her press conference until later today. Maybe the results weren’t to her liking so she needs to stuff a few more ballot boxes.
Because Bysiewicz is dumber than a pile of rocks.
~~~~~~~~~~
Those who’ve been researching this deceitful cypher in our White House and attempting to discover who he really is, will remember Susan Bysiewicz .. Sec. of State for Connecticut.
Leo Donofrio filed suit on behalf of a CT resident who raised the issue of Bysiewicz performing her sworn duty in confirming the eligibility of BHO on the CT 2008 presidential ballot.
She’s a democrat .. probably is part of Soros’ Sec of State project.
~~~~~~~
In 1998, she sought the Democratic nomination for Secretary of the State. At the state Democratic Convention, she lost the party’s endorsement for the nomination, to Representative Ellen Scalettar, but won enough delegates’ votes to qualify to run for the nomination in a primary. She won both the nomination, and, in the general election in November, the office itself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Bysiewicz
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Cort Wrotnowski contacted the Secretary of State’s office in his home state of Connecticut and inquired as to what steps the Secretary of State had taken to determine the eligibility of the Presidential candidates. On October 17, 2008, an attorney from the Secretary of State’s office, a Mr. Ramos, told Wrotnowski that “it’s not our job” to examine the eligibility of the candidates.
Wrotnowski believes that under the State laws of Connecticut, it is clearly the responsibility of the Secretary of State to examine and verify the eligibility of all candidates.
Wrotnowski believes that Mr. Ramos’s statement was an admission that the Secretary of State of Connecticut had failed to protect the integrity of the electoral process.
A lawsuit was brought against Secretary of State Bysiewicz in the Connecticut Supreme Court (Case number SC 18264) for failure to carry out the laws of Connecticut.
The lawsuit was brought to the U.S. Supreme Court where it was reviewed by all nine justices. At least five of the nine U.S. Supreme Court justices decided on December 15, 2008 that this case would not be heard in open court.
http://www.cusc.org/cases/Wrotnowski-v-Bysiewicz/
~~~~~~~~~~
And from the spawn of George:
$$$
OPINION
DECEMBER 15, 2008.It’s Time to Junk the Electoral College
We don’t need an amendment to do it
By JONATHAN SOROS
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122930124441705413.html?mod=rss_opinion_main