Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: STARWISE
used Watergate as an example. Do you really think Obama could be facing a Watergate type scandal? I mean, something that big?

Yes I do. I hope not. That is what is going on right now – I’m trying to explain that part of it to you but maybe I’m not doing a good enough job of it.

There are those in the party – the Democratic Party, who are right now actively preparing for that possible outcome and taking protective measures to protect the party. Let Obama go down for it – but save the party.



Oh, here's a scandal that would be bigger than Watergate. Obama and his Liewyers have to respond by today. Gee, wonder if they have met the SCOTUS deadline?


SCOTUS Docket Kershner highlighted

32 posted on 11/03/2010 5:51:58 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel; Fred Nerks; Danae; butterdezillion; thouworm; rxsid; thecodont; bushpilot1; maggief; ...

Hmmmmm .... please ping me when you find out.

~~~~~~~~~~~~

No. 10-446

Title:
Charles Kerchner, et al., Petitioners
v.
Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.
Docketed: October 4, 2010
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case Nos.: (09-4209)
Decision Date: July 2, 2010
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sep 30 2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2010)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Attorneys for Petitioners:
Mario Apuzzo 185 Gatzmer Avenue (732)-521-1900
Jamesburg, NJ 08831
apuzzo@erols.com
Party name: Charles Kerchner, et al.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Attorneys for Respondents:
Neal Kumar Katyal Acting Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
SupremeCtBriefs@USDOJ
Party name: Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

1.Whether petitioners sufficiently articulated a case or controversy against respondents which gives them Article III standing to make their Fifth Amendment due process and equal protection claims against them.

2.Whether putative President Obama can be anArticle II “natural born Citizen” if he was born in the United States to a United States citizen mother and anon-United States citizen British father and under the British Nationality Act 1948 he was born a Britishcitizen.

3.Whether putative President Obama and Congress violated petitioners’ Fifth Amendment due process rights to life, liberty, safety, security, tranquility, and property and Ninth Amendment rights by Congress failing to assure them pursuant to the Twentieth Amendment that Obama qualified as an Article II “natural born Citizen” before confirming his electoral votes and by Obama refusing to conclusively prove that he is a “natural born Citizen.”

4.Whether Congress violated petitioners’ rights under the Fifth Amendment to equal protection of their life, liberty, safety, security, tranquility, and property by investigating and confirming the “natural born Citizen”status of presidential candidate, John McCain, but not that of presidential candidate, Barack Obama.

http://politicalvelcraft.org/2010/10/05/obama-aka-soetoros-ass-hauled-up-before-the-united-states-supreme-court-response-due-november-3rd-2010/


40 posted on 11/03/2010 6:18:59 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel
Photobucket
44 posted on 11/03/2010 6:41:36 PM PDT by mojitojoe (Adios Crist, Grayson, no gavel Pelosi, Odumbo, YOU'RE NEXT!!!!! WAY TO GO RUBIO!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson