Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McDonald's slams San Francisco ban on Happy Meals
Yahoo News via AFP ^ | November 3, 2010 | Grant Junkie

Posted on 11/03/2010 4:19:33 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084

Fast food giant McDonald's said Wednesday it was "extremely disappointed" at a ruling by San Francisco authorities banning high-calorie Happy Meals, which entice children to eat with free toys.

The response came after the Californian city's board of supervisors voted to forbid restaurants from giving gifts with meals that contain too much fat and sugar.

"We are extremely disappointed with this decision. It?s not what our customers want, nor is it something they asked for," said McDonald's spokeswoman Danya Proud.

Happy Meals, which typically come in a colorful cardboard box packed with a burger, a drink, fries and desert, are popular with hard-pressed parents as well as children, she said.

"Public opinion continues to be overwhelmingly against this misguided legislation. Parents tell us it's their right and responsibility, not the government's, to ... to choose what?s right for their children."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: US: California
KEYWORDS: california; happymeal; mcdonalds; nannystate; sanfrancisco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
Link to original FR posted story:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2620691/posts

1 posted on 11/03/2010 4:19:35 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SheLion; Gabz; Hank Kerchief; 383rr; libertarian27; traviskicks; bamahead; CSM; valkyrieanne; ...

Big Brother, Nanny State, Grant Junkie, Bogus Study, Junk Science, Social Engineering, Egalitarian, Central Planning, Sheeple Control, Food Cop, Smoke Nazi, Socialism, Collectivism

This is an extremely low volume ping list. 6 per week max. To be added to or deleted from this ping list, please click one of the following:

Eric, you are a genius add me to your ping list or Eric, you are a jackass, take me off this ping list

To request that I stop using these gay html colors and fonts, please send me a private message below.

____________________________________________________________________

Constitution of the Left Wing Nanny State of Liberals:

Photobucket

Picture courtesy of unixfox. All rights reserved. Copyright MMVII. Any use of the pictures descriptions or accounts of this ping without the express written consent of unixfox, Eric Blair, or Major League Baseball is strictly prohibited. Some restrictions apply. Ping not available in all states. For erections lasting longer than four hours, call the Guiness Book of World Records. Use only as directed.

Preamble:

We the People Sheeple of the United States Nanny State, in Order to form a more perfect Union Socialist Utopia, establish Justice Socially engineer a country of non smoking, physically fit, seat belt and helmet wearing teetotalers, ensure domestic Tranquility Smoking bans in bars, limits on unhealthy food and social drinking, provide for the common defense Universal Healthcare, promote the general Welfare health of the population whether they like it or not, in order to save above mentioned Universal Healthcare entitlement program from bankruptcy, and secure the Blessings of Liberty Dependency to ourselves progressive liberals and our Posterity Hitler Youth who we brainwash through public school education, do ordain decree and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. Nanny State of Liberals.

2 posted on 11/03/2010 4:21:41 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Beware of the Socialist Government-Academia Grant Junkie-Rich "non-profit"-Liberal Media Complex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

Jerry Brown as Governor. Newsome as his sidekick and Kamala as top cop.

San Francisco values are a mestasizing cancer!


3 posted on 11/03/2010 4:22:01 PM PDT by Califreak (November 2008 proved that Idiocracy isn't just a movie anymore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

Happy Meals bad. Marijuana Good.


4 posted on 11/03/2010 4:22:27 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

It’d be tossed out as unconstitutional in a normal state.


5 posted on 11/03/2010 4:22:48 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Nuke the corrupt commie bastards to HELL!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

Don’t people want happy meals after they toke?

This makes no sense.


6 posted on 11/03/2010 4:23:08 PM PDT by Califreak (November 2008 proved that Idiocracy isn't just a movie anymore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

didn’t know there were any children in SF.


7 posted on 11/03/2010 4:23:22 PM PDT by rhinohunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

As a parent I can tell you the kids will still want to eat at Mickie D’s. It’s not the toys, which have a half life of about a day anyway.


8 posted on 11/03/2010 4:23:31 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

Close all McDonalds in SF and move outside city limits. SF will then pay a price for their stupidity.


9 posted on 11/03/2010 4:24:29 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Release Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich and let him and his family get on with their lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

Who cares?

Their parents are breeders...


10 posted on 11/03/2010 4:24:49 PM PDT by Califreak (November 2008 proved that Idiocracy isn't just a movie anymore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

Yank those toys and food from kids and open more bathhouses. Now those are not health hazards, are they SF?


11 posted on 11/03/2010 4:25:53 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Release Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich and let him and his family get on with their lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084
banning high-calorie Happy Meals, which entice children to eat with free toys.

Perhaps they should us a fork instead...
12 posted on 11/03/2010 4:26:38 PM PDT by TV Dinners (Hope is not a Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084
banning high-calorie Happy Meals, which entice children to eat with free toys.

Perhaps they should use a fork instead...
13 posted on 11/03/2010 4:26:48 PM PDT by TV Dinners (Hope is not a Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

HAPPY MEAL


14 posted on 11/03/2010 4:28:15 PM PDT by FrankR (November 2nd is NOT an election - it's a RESTRAINING ORDER.....VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084
Hello laughing stock of the country. Is there anyone there who is not goofy?
15 posted on 11/03/2010 4:28:30 PM PDT by mandaladon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

Must be different here in Texas....we can order a Happy Meal with chicken nuggets, apples instead of fries and milk or juice or water instead of soda. But....it’s a decision and choice one has to actually request. Maybe SF residents are too stupid to do that on their own. Helpless idiots


16 posted on 11/03/2010 4:30:25 PM PDT by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhinohunter

That’s a good one!

Maybe the chilruns are adopted from Africa by gay couples.


17 posted on 11/03/2010 4:30:24 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Beware of the Socialist Government-Academia Grant Junkie-Rich "non-profit"-Liberal Media Complex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rhinohunter
didn’t know there were any children in SF

Really. Even if a couple is oriented in a normal way the most they are allowed to have is one. I've read people are frowned upon if they have more than one child unit.

18 posted on 11/03/2010 4:31:18 PM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever
"Close all McDonalds in SF and move outside city limits. SF will then pay a price for their stupidity."

Good idea, build them just over the city line and advertise in the city.

19 posted on 11/03/2010 4:31:59 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

This is patently unConstitutional. But if McDonald’s - yet again - chooses to aquiese to leftist/environmentalists demands then so be it. I will not get all bent out of shape about it.

McDonald’s has a long history of caving in to every demand of leftists. If they choose not to use their vast corporate power to do more than express their displeasure (kinda like a UN letter) then I ain’t getting all jazzed up either.

Man up, McDonald’s!


20 posted on 11/03/2010 4:31:59 PM PDT by Obadiah (BHO -- out the door in 4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson