BTW, all the crimes you mentioned, are not covered by the constitution,those are state crimes,. as they should be, Quit being a nanny elitist by telling other folks how to lead thier lives
Do you ALWAYS go around refuting yourself in one fell phrase?
Have you actually NEVER stopped to analyze your worldview?
(It doesn't appear that you have...so allow me to do so...so others can avoid your sheer folly)
ALL: Eastforker's definition of a "nanny elitist" is: "Telling other folks how to lead thier" [sic] "lives"
Eastforker thinks that's a primary "no-no"
The "topper" here is that he tells me (I qualify as one of those "other folks") how to lead my Internet-posting life by directing me to "quit" telling others how to lead their Internet posting lives.
Hmmm....and you see no contradiction here how?
Eastforker, you have just qualified yourself as a "nanny elitist." Congrats!
BTW, here's another self-refuting statement so that you can compare your own to:
The only absolute is there are no absolutes [except the absolute that there are no absolutes...oh, I guess that means there is at least one absolute, after all...but you know, that doesn't stop a person from believing there are no absolutes...as long as you realize there is at least one absolute...ad infinitum]
From here on hence, we shall call your similar contribution the "Eastforker Freeper Principle," which I restate for all thusly:
"The primary absolute
is that you shouldn't tell others how to live their lives;
and should others break that Primary Commandment,
then I'm going to have to tell that 'other' that he/she shouldn't live his/her life that way."
And this was a STATE initiative. So what's your point?
Quit being a nanny elitist by telling other folks how to lead thier lives
So tell me, just how is granting humanity to the unborn telling people how to live their lives?