[workerbee]

Oh good grief. We never HAD Delaware, Sherlock. And even had Castle been the nominee and won, he already said he had no intention of helping repeal Deathcare.

[TexasGreg]

Oh good grief. We never HAD Delaware, Sherlock. And even had Castle been the nominee and won, he already said he had no intention of helping repeal Deathcare.

Castle would have done ONE thing that would have made a MAJOR difference nation wide: he would have caucused with the GOP and, thus, probably made the difference in who controls the Senate. I didn't like him, didn't agree with him on many issues, but he nevertheless would have caucused the right way and brought control of the Senate to the GOP. Now, because of this loss, the Dems will maintain the Senate, Obama will be able to appoint more Judges to the Federal Bench, and we can't stop 'em. Our liberties will continue to be eroded in the courts and more un-born babies will die.

Don't misunderstand. I wanted O'Donnell to win both in the Primary and then in the general election. But I don't see ANYTHING good in Coons winning.

[eddie willers]

And even had Castle been the nominee and won, he already said he had no intention of helping repeal Deathcare.

People keep missing the big picture. With a majority you now have Committee chairs and you can determine what does, or does not, get out of committee to the floor.

I would much rather have a Castle and a Tarkanian than a Coons and a Reid.

RINOs could be given a small voice in the Party.... could even be ignored....but their number would speak loudly.