It looks like these two men were correct. |
|
THOSE NASTY men could have Helped her win!!!
No, it looks like their efforts were successful. They weren’t bystanders.
Yes. (If Fox is right) And we should thank them for trashing a Conservative.</s>
Good bye Karl, Good bye Charles.
They may have won the battle but they’ve lost the war. They are not on my side.
Of course they were.
And anybody who wants to now brand these guys as "enemies" can go sit with Obama.
Based on what Martha what’s her name on fox just said O’Donnell didn’t get the republican vote.
let me translate that These two man caused O’Donnell to lose. Oh and the Castle idiot that didn’t endorse O’Donnell.
I despise these people who put themselves over the good of the country.
Those two men, and I like Krauthammer, didn’t like Angle, Miller, O’Donnell, Rubio or Paul. Paul and Rubio won because they are in independent thinking states. Miller and Angle may still win too. What this election showed me is how low establishment Republicans are. If Rubio or Paul would have even been remotely weak, guys like Rove would have destroyed them, like they tried to do to O’Donnell before she even got going. They didn’t have to enthusiastically endorse her but they went out of their way to bring down the Republican support for her. Low budget
It’s amazing, even here on Free Republic that we got people who was in favor of the other guy, Chris Coons... just amazing...
FU Romney troll
Go Mitt. Go Mitt. Go Mitt.
Rove has made no secret of his support for Romney as McCains VP.
There, fixed it for you.
Yeah, tonight Rove and Krauthammer scored a victory that a lot of us will remember for a long, long time.
She’s a good conservative put down by sore loser Karl Rove and his country club RINO cabal of which you are a cheerleader. Bye bye RINO/Romney troll.
Both are RINO’s that were assisted by the establishment Repub’s in Delaware to withhold support or outright work against the elected nominee of the party, O’Donnell....
Yes, but it's not like they went out on a limb with controversial statements. They basically said that a moderate Pubbie had a much better chance than a conservative Pubbie of winning an election in an ultra-liberal state (DE), especially if the latter is viewed by the majority of the electorate as being a political lightweight. Very safe statement. Kraut and Rove work for FNC as analysts, not cheerleaders. And I watch Special Report for analysis, not cheerleading.
Sarah Palin was on FNC a minute ago echoing Rove and Kraut, saying that "O'Donnell's loss in such a blue state isn't exactly a big surprise," but that she was hoping for an upset. ...as were all of us.