Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: facedodge

We need a plausible mathematical geometric objective algorithm, or at least limits to tortuousness.

Federal offices need federal controls. Same for voting fraud.


6 posted on 11/02/2010 7:46:49 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed ("Nobody tell Barack Obama what number comes after a trillion" --S.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Beelzebubba
We need a plausible mathematical geometric objective algorithm, or at least limits to tortuousness.

I've been thinking the same thing. Just a few thoughts off the top of my head:

  1. Draw districts so that the sum of the length of all boundaries is minimized.
  2. Follow political boundaries as much as practical, while still accomplishing #1. County boundaries take precedence, followed by municipal boundaries.
  3. Ethnicity, gender, religion, sexual preference, political party affiliation, and even voter registration are NOT to be considered. Population is the only consideration.
  4. For purposes of redistricting, US citizens are the only ones to be counted. Everyone else is a guest, and won't be voting anyway.

Unfortunately, it will probably require a Constitutional amendment to enforce this uniformly in every state. To sweeten the pot, I'll toss out a few more suggestions. Comments and counter-points welcome:

OK, this became a lot longer than I planned. It's more of a "stream of thoughts" than a thought-out strategy. What did I miss?
9 posted on 11/02/2010 8:12:19 AM PDT by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson