Voter fraud is treason.
At some point we’ve got to start treating voter fraud for what it is, instead of a game. Until we do, we will never get this under control.
Voter Fraud Is Treason
I agree totally. It should bring HARD prison time!
>Voter fraud is treason.
>At some point we’ve got to start treating voter fraud for what it is, instead of a game. Until we do, we will never get this under control.
>Voter Fraud Is Treason
No! It’s *NOT* treason... not without some logical reasoning which would be rejected out-of-hand by the court-system.
Treason is specifically defined, in the Constitution, as: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
Now, as for me I believe that voter-fraud is [indirectly] giving aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States of America by undermining the legitimacy of the [sovereignty of] the government thereof. However, we must realize that “voter fraud” is a drop of piss in the wind compared to the bloody evisceration of our Constitution by the most Tyrannical and Lawless of the branches of our government: the Judiciary.
Consider the Constitutional prohibitions against Ex Post Facto [that is, retroactive] laws that’s right PLURAL.
Art 1, Sec 9, Paragraph 3: “No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.”
Art 1, sec 10, Paragraph 10: “No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; **PASS ANY** Bill of Attainder, **EX POST FACTO LAW**, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.”
So then the founders thought it so important to prohibit Ex Post Facto law (and bills of attainder) that they prohibited them from BOTH the Federal government AND the State governments. However, in 1798, in a case titled “Calder v. Bull” the Supreme Court decreed that the prohibition against Ex Post Facto law applied *ONLY* to criminal law [despite the clear wording of the Constitution].
Now, that very same pronouncement is used to justify the retroactive changes to tax law/regulation because they aren’t criminal laws but “regulatory” laws [a term wholly conjured out of nothingness by our political/judicial complex]. Yet, for violating one of these retroactively changed tax laws you are prosecuted/persecuted in CRIMINAL court.
Thus a clear example of how the Constitution is violated by the Arrogant Bastards in Black-robes; the God-Kings of America; the Supreme Court.