Fair enough. I understand your point about direct evidence but the circumstantial evidence is overwhelming. Even in the mid-’90s the organization Democratic Socialists of America listed about 100 Dem congress critters on their rolls. One can only accept the euphemism ‘Socialist’ if they want to willingly overlook their pro-communist ties and stated policies.
Somehow, we have got to make it respectable to be anti-Communist. Hell, we cannot even make it respectable to be anti-global warming hysteria even when the world has been shown actual fraud. Our task is daunting.
Beck and Limbaugh, as examples, know that they cannot put a single foot down wrong ever or they will be discredited up and down the land. Even when conservatives reproduce liberals speaking in their own words the conservatives are accused of capital crimes like bigotry or racism for even alluding to the matter.
The left has won a great victory by so obscuring the matter of its unsavory connections and antecedents that most people throw up their hands and go about their lives. The left knows how to mobilize indignation on its own behalf and how to smother reality when it becomes inconvenient. We are unlikely to get Congressional hearings on any of these matters even though the most obvious and appropriate subject for congressional investigation concerns the activities of Obama's Czars which no doubt would reveal a world of dubious connections. We are unlikely to get an academic to write a book exposing Communist infiltration. The press has no appetite for it.
David Horowitz and Glenn Beck are brave men but who has their back?