[SumProVita]

What is STUNNING is that people were stupid to enough to believe this interpretation. Someone connected to the Vatican might have misspoken this way....but the official Vatican would never do so.

[Rashputin]

I hope you're right, I really do. It's bad enough to have 6 flavors of Lutherans, 8 of Methodists, thousands of Baptist flavors, and myriad others with their own interpretations that call themselves Christian (along with many new age and herbivore groups who are obviously lying), without having the Catholic Church finally go all the way over the edge.

They're hanging on by their fingernails, but they're not all the way to the “free for all” define your own religion just yet.

Regards

[metmom]

Yeah, right. Another *The Catholic church doesn’t really mean what it says*

We now have to go for an interpretation of what someone wants us to believe what the Catholic church MEANT and what it said isn’t what it meant.

Sure.....

Don’t they ever get tired of this? I mean really, they’ve worn that line threadbare. Nobody is believing it any more.

You know, if the Catholic church can’t get it’s message across without some Catholic reinterpretation of the incriminating evidence, they really need to find someone more literate to do their writing so that what they say is what they mean and what they mean is what they say.

[edwinland]

This selectively edited article has been making its way around the internet.

Did anyone notice that the supposed Vatican “spokesman” is Monsignor Cyril Salim Bustros, Greek Melkite archbishop from ... Massachusetts?

Next.

[Brucifer]

“cogito,cogito,ergo cogito sum” Ambrose Bierce