So out of the 150 or so 'write-in' candidates, the poll just automatically goes to the Cow?
Yeah. Right.
Posted on 10/30/2010 2:36:47 PM PDT by South40
Miller +1 has got to mean Miller +10-15 in reality. No one is going to bother to write “Murkowski”. Just look how many times it has been misspelled on this thread.
STOP IT NOW!!!!
After the elections, Politico should be banned from FR. Just my conservative opinion.
Folks, “Politico” is far too late to stop this destroy Obama & his traitor Democrat Party train!!! Joe Miller will do just fine if the “good guys & gals” in Alaska just get to the polls and vote for him come Election day November 2, 2010. And that goes for all who love America. Obama and the Democrat Party certainly have no love for America or all Americans!!! They hate it!!! Vote to destroy the entire “anti-American” democrat Party on Election day, November 2, 2010!!! As for Obama loving “Politico”, they are no more able to gin up votes for Obama and his socialist ilk, as is John Stewart & Steve Colbert and that joke of a rally the morons held today!!!
I don’t believe she’s actually on the ballot, but they will hand out a list of the write-in candidates.
While it’s not ideal, I’d take a Murkowski win over a Democrat pick-up so long as she caucuses with the Republicans.
Bogus poll. Especially after Lisa caused the suspension of Dan Fagan from the airwaves.
It’s Myrrhcowski.
It’s Myrrhcowski. And her name isn’t Lisa, it’s Julie.
Miller would win by a landslide if Murkowski was out. Instead, she is going to split the vote which makes this close.
Thanks for that clarification.
More than a few problems with this “poll.”
First, according to the Politico piece: “The poll appeared to ask the opinion of 500 respondents — not registered or likely voters, like most political polls. The poll appeared first on the local liberal blog The Mudflats.”
Second, the Hays Research Group is somewhat mysterious, in that the principals of the firm and their backgrounds are nowhere to be found on their website. Not one human being is identified whatsoever. None. Wonder why?
Third, there have been reports that the left is leaking and hyping ‘polls’ with such surprising results as a tactic to demoralize the conservative, highly motivated voter. (Shades of those 2000 Presidential phony, early exit polls showing a huge win for longface?)
Finally, as has been posted repeatedly, there is NO way at all to effectively measure a write-in candidate. Especially given the published list of Alaskans on the Moronski-instigated Election Day handout to voters for the Senate race listing some 250 write-in candidates. How’s that for a beautiful counter-punch?
Nothing to see here. Tuesday night/Wednesday morning (Alaska time) will tell all: a very likely Miller win. Less than three days to continue all-out to make it happen.
John Kerry was a shoe in, too.
If Miller doesn’t win, I would prefer the Dhimmicrat winning. It will send the GOP establishment a message that they shouldn’t have encouraged old pout mouth.
And from what I am hearing, they will probably accept any of those spellings.
Joe wins this, not to worry.
Who did they poll the Anchorage Democrat Club?
If you believe this, there’s some swamp land in Louisianna I want to unload.
Dittos! Bull!
Look at all the weird news stories from yesterday, to today, that elbow out all the real polling data that might depress the RAT turnout.
Then there’s Halloween... no time for zero to further energize his base.
All that could be said and done has.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.