Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Big a Wave? Ask Cook and Rothenberg
NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE ^ | October 29, 2010 | Henry Olsen

Posted on 10/30/2010 7:47:04 AM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: KansasGirl

Yep, On Tuesday, LETS ROLL!


21 posted on 10/30/2010 11:04:48 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: diogenes ghost
Gerrymandered districts skew "wave" numbers so much as to make them neaningless as regards house results.

Actually, they tend to inflate the "wave" -- if it is a Republican one.

For example, one group that be counted upon to vote 90% Democrat is the blacks. But they are "packed" in districts that are 80% black -- so as to insure the election of black representatives. They may be 13% of the population, but they are a voting majority in only, say, 6-7% of the districts.

As a rule, gerrymandered districts are (intentionally) more heavily skewed to one party than the other. Leaving the "wave" to subsume all those other districts that are generally in the 45-55% voting range.

Roughly speaking 70% of Democrat voters are in 30% of the total districts.

22 posted on 10/30/2010 11:14:19 AM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: svcw

I am sticking with 106 house seats and 16 senate seats.

Yahooooooooooo !


23 posted on 10/30/2010 11:20:34 AM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kara37
This may have been true in the past. However, I believe this election will have more than a few races that will blindside everyone.

My guess: If the East Coast goes for the GOP in a big way, as expected, the rest of the country will have progressively lower liberal turnout in the late hours at the polls and that will increase our margin or even flip some races in the West. We just have to make sure that working Americans vote in the West even after good news from the East.

24 posted on 10/30/2010 11:21:08 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Norseman

That said, here’s my guess at the House based off Real Clear Politics present numbers.

224 now viewed as leaning Rep. We won’t lose more than 4 of these, so 220 so far.

40 now viewed as Toss Ups. We will win about 30 of these because all of the momentum is toward Rep now and a lot of these will be Leaning Rep by Tuesday, so 220 + 30 = 250 so far.

26 now viewed as Leaning Dem. We will win about 8 of these as they will be Toss Ups by Tuesday and again, the momentum is toward Reps, so 258 so far.

24 now viewed as Likely Dem. We will win at least one of these, so 259 is the grand total (double check my math...it’s been lousy lately.)

So 259 minus the current 179 held gives a pick up of a nice round 80 seats. And I think it could be higher, not lower. (I wouldn’t be surprised to get 35 of the Toss-Ups and 10 of the Leaning Dems and 2 of the Likely Dems, and only lose 2 of the Leaning Reps instead of 4, for a total of 90 pick ups.)

Incidentally, to get the magic 111 seats for a veto-proof majority, we need all the currently leaning Rep, all the toss ups, and exactly all those listed as Leaning Dems: 224+40+26=290. (A week ago we needed 5 of the Likely Dems as well, but things have been shifting Rep day by day.)


Excellent analysis

Much better than the crappy pollster’s ...

Thanks.


I predict 100+


25 posted on 10/30/2010 11:24:52 AM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Roughly speaking 70% of Democrat voters are in 30% of the total districts.


So, we get 435 times 70% or 300 seats ???

Whoopeeeeeeeeeeeeee


26 posted on 10/30/2010 11:28:14 AM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Roughly speaking 70% of Democrat voters are in 30% of the total districts.


So, we get 435 times 70% or 300 seats ???

Whoopeeeeeeeeeeeeee


( Geeeez, do you think that would teach Obama something

or would he still be just like he is now

or worse ???)


27 posted on 10/30/2010 11:29:26 AM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Reporting Voter Fraud

The Republican Party has set up a National Hotline, which will be staffed with Attorneys to handle polling issues as well as possible voter fraud or intimidation.
1 - 888 - 775 - 8117. IF you even SUSPECT this is happening, PLEASE call for their free advice.

http://www.resistnet.com/


28 posted on 10/30/2010 12:23:30 PM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
These pollsters have been purposefully denying the fact that a massive wave is coming.

Now, we are finally seeing little cracks appearing, letting in the light.

They will still underestimate it.

Just look at the GOP primary races this year and note the huge turnouts, not seen since the 1930's.

29 posted on 10/30/2010 1:00:36 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson