To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
You can achieve alot when America ships all their jobs over to you in order to achieve their own self destruction.
2 posted on
10/29/2010 11:55:28 PM PDT by
Tempest
(I give up)
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
7,168 GPUs - the Ultimate Gamer Indeed!
I can't wait until they get thing miniaturized down to iPad size.
3 posted on
10/30/2010 12:03:17 AM PDT by
J Edgar
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
7,168 GPUs - the Ultimate Gamer Indeed!
I can't wait until they get thing miniaturized down to iPad size.
4 posted on
10/30/2010 12:03:39 AM PDT by
J Edgar
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
Didn’t they achieve a very fast supercomputer simply linking playstation 3s, probably weighing under a hundred pounds and costing a few thousand bucks?
5 posted on
10/30/2010 12:47:40 AM PDT by
TheThinker
(Communists: taking over the world one kooky doomsday scenario at a time.)
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
Gotta love them “magawats”.
7 posted on
10/30/2010 12:50:37 AM PDT by
Bobibutu
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
Gotta love them “magawatts”.
8 posted on
10/30/2010 12:51:36 AM PDT by
Bobibutu
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
Add the made in China tag to yet another gadget: the worlds fastest supercomputer. China says it has the most powerful computing system a machine called Tianhe-1A. The supercomputer uses 7,168 NVIDIA Tesla M2050 GPUs (graphics processing units) and 14,336 Intel Xeon CPUs and is capable of clocking 2.507 petaflops or 2,507 trillion floating point calculations per second.
10 posted on
10/30/2010 12:58:26 AM PDT by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
That we know about. Certain agencies probably have faster computers.
13 posted on
10/30/2010 2:19:33 AM PDT by
GAB-1955
(I write books, love my wife, serve my nation, and believe in the Resurrection.)
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
What happens when the softwares catches up to the hardware?
14 posted on
10/30/2010 2:25:34 AM PDT by
screaminsunshine
(the way to win this game is not to play)
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
China has taken the lead in the supercomputer race, having built a 155 ton system using 7,168 GPUs...
16 posted on
10/30/2010 2:44:21 AM PDT by
Talisker
(When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on its own.)
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
The ultimate efficacy of these supercomputers depends heavily upon the programs they are made to run being able to split their tasks more or less equally across all the individual processors in the machine. A badly designed program or an ill-suited problem will leave almost all the processors idle.
17 posted on
10/30/2010 3:23:35 AM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
4.04 MEGAWATTS? What does it use for logic gates? 12AX7’s?
Herm
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
Ah, finally a machine that can run Windows.
23 posted on
10/30/2010 8:50:22 AM PDT by
thatjoeguy
(Wind is just air, but pushier.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson