Posted on 10/29/2010 3:26:04 PM PDT by Shermy
BOSTON Sen. John Kerry is pushing for a dishonorable discharge for a Navy sailor convicted of fatally shooting dead his girlfriend in Virginia.
Kerry sent a letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates requesting an investigation into the Navys actions following the February 2009 death of sailor Caitlin Trask.
The 20-year-old Bradford resident was killed by Darren Mackie of Wisconsin. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison after pleading guilty to involuntary manslaughter but was never given a dishonorable discharge.
Kerry said he cannot understand how an active duty sailor could kill another sailor and avoid a dishonorable discharge.
He wants the investigation to determine options to facilitate Mackies dishonorable and find out if any Navy personnel were derelict in their duty related to this case.
A month old, but Kerry’s mouth is in the news again.
Funny, him and discharge statuses...
Oh, I don't know, John. A sailor could, for instance give aid and comfort to the enemy in a war resulting in sailors getting killed and he wouldn't be dishonorably discharged, would he?
Yeah - I cannot understand how a traitorous SOB like Kerry could have avoided a dishonorable discharge...
Lamh Foistenach Abu!
“Yeah - I cannot understand how a traitorous SOB like Kerry could have avoided a dishonorable discharge..”
Actually, there is a story there, that he had a general or lower, but Jimmy Carter ratcheted it up to honorable, or some story like that...
Lamh Foistenach Abu!
If he'd shot an unarmed boy in the back he'd have gotten a Silver Star, right John?
The family thinks this is too light and wanted him tried by a court martial. Obviously, they never heard of the Double Jeopardy clause.
Now they are pushing for a DD and Kerry is playing the publicity whore. My guess is the thing was an oversight.
God help us if we continue to allow Vermin Traitors to represent us.
I did some googling. The shooting happened off base and the guy got 10 years for involuntary manslaughter by a civilian court. Obviously, a civilian court can’t award a DD which would be routine in this kind of case in a court martial. FWIW, the guy claimed it was an accidental discharge and he didn’t mean to do it.
The family thinks this is too light and wanted him tried by a court martial. Obviously, they never heard of the Double Jeopardy clause.
Now they are pushing for a DD and Kerry is playing the publicity whore. My guess is the thing was an oversight
Thanks for the additional info.
The only way to get a dishonorable discharge is to be court-martialed. You cannot get a DD thru Administrative discharge procedures. Since tbe sailor was tried and convicted in a civilian court...the military really cannot do anything but offer a general or “other than honorable” discharge
I’m a little bit confused (nothing new, there).
The huge majority of posts here are bashing Kerry without mercy. Is that because you think that the sailor in question should NOT get a dishonorable, or is just because Kerry opened his mouth?
It would seem to me that if Kerry is trying to write a wrong (even if for selfish reasons), he should be given some cridit here.
Bottom line: How did you think the relatives of the dead woman feel about all this? I’m guessing they are grateful to Kerry. Kerry’s remarks, in some measure, may ease some of their pain. And that’s good enough for me.
kerry and odumbo always have an ulterior motive
As much as I despise this individual, and as much as his purple heart commendations are bogus, the kid he shot could only be considered "unarmed" by a very hair-splitting interpretation of the facts. The kid had B-40 with a dud load.
How could a Navy Officer shoot a wounded teen aged enemy in cold blood and end up with 3 band aid medals and a ticket home instead of being charged as a war criminal?
Involuntary manslaughter does not necessarily result in a dishonorable discharge any more than leaving the scene of a fatal accident results in one resigning his seat in the Senate.
“Kerry said he cannot understand how an active duty sailor could kill another sailor and avoid a dishonorable discharge.”
Without addressing the serious crime and why it did not lead to a dishonorable, I just want to ask this question.
Is it something like when a COMMISSIONED officer in the US NAVY, ( John Fudggedup Kerry), meets with officials of the enemy gooberment, (the North Vietnamese), in another country, (France), while we are at WAR with them without getting charged with TREASON?
Nah, that couldn’t be it, the people involved in this aren’t political whores.
I re-read the story and it doesn't say he got an honorable discharge, just that he didn't get a dishonorable. So, maybe the Navy already did the max they can do? Even an other than honorable is a pretty heavy hit on a resume.
This phony “war hero” has no right at all to get into or question such matters, concerning any branch of the military, in as much as a good part of his own record is fiction he helped place in that record.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.