Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

The girl’s parents should refuse to get an attorney and have the little girl defend herself in order to mock the stupidity of the judge.


11 posted on 10/29/2010 10:25:17 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sgt_Schultze
The girl’s parents should refuse to get an attorney and have the little girl defend herself in order to mock the stupidity of the judge.

Obviously you didn't read the article. The mothers are named in the suit also.

15 posted on 10/29/2010 10:32:26 AM PDT by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Sgt_Schultze
The girl’s parents should refuse to get an attorney and have the little girl defend herself in order to mock the stupidity of the judge.

Because mocking a judge always works out well. (/s)

The 4 year old is the BASIS of the suit, and not the eventual RESPONSIBLE PARTY. That will be the parents. If the judge didn't allow the SUIT to go against the girl, then the parents can't be held responsible.

See how that works?

16 posted on 10/29/2010 10:36:24 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson