Posted on 10/28/2010 8:46:10 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
President Obama's support for civil unions but not gay marriage has always been a somewhat odd and, you get the feeling, perhaps disingenuous position. For one thing, if he really believes that marriage should only be between a man and a woman, as he's often said, why doesn't he support laws that ensure marriage will only be between a man and a woman, such as California's Prop 8? And how could someone so progressive on gay issues in general he's against the Defense of Marriage Act, he's against "don't ask, don't tell," he's already appointed more gays than any president ever, he's equated the gay rights movement with the civil rights movement and has spoken often of equality for gay people be behind the curve on gay marriage? Plus, there were those questionnaires he filled out in 1996, in which he expressed his support for gay marriage years before even civil unions first took hold in Vermont. When you add it all up, the only conclusion that really makes sense is that, in his heart, Obama is fine with gay marriage, but didn't think the nation was ready for a president who felt that way.
But an interesting thing happened over the course of only the past couple of years: Approval of gay marriage surged, it was legalized in a number of states, and Obama's support for civil unions, which would have been considered relatively enlightened five or ten years ago, began to seem downright antiquated to many people. As various leaders of the Democratic Party switched from the civil-unions camp to the gay-marriage camp Bill Clinton, Chuck Schumer, Howard Dean, and Chris Dodd, to name a few Obama has been stuck in an early-aughts mentality, at least publicly.
But from what he told a group of liberal bloggers yesterday, that may change fairly soon. When AMERICAblog's Joe Subday asked Obama about his position on gay marriage ("People in our community are really desperate to know"), Obama all but admitted he was in the process of abandoning his civil-unions stance:
"I am a strong supporter of civil unions."
Okay, it doesn't seem like it at first. But read on!
"As you say, I have been to this point unwilling to sign on to same-sex marriage primarily because of my understandings of the traditional definitions of marriage.
But I also think youre right that attitudes evolve, including mine. And I think that it is an issue that I wrestle with and think about because I have a whole host of friends who are in gay partnerships. I have staff members who are in committed, monogamous relationships, who are raising children, who are wonderful parents.
And I care about them deeply. And so while Im not prepared to reverse myself here, sitting in the Roosevelt Room at 3:30 in the afternoon, I think its fair to say that its something that I think a lot about. Thats probably the best youll do out of me today." (Laughter.)
It's not all that subtle what Obama is communicating here: He's going to announce his support for gay marriage. When exactly that will happen is unclear, but former Clinton adviser Richard Socarides's logic makes sense: "Presidents don't usually think out loud unless they intend to send a signal that they are shifting a position. I think [Obama] realizes he can't run as a gay rights advocate in 2012 and be against marriage equality."
If Obama does support gay marriage during his 2012 campaign, it would be a historic milestone for gay rights. After he finally announces his change of heart, he'll have to defend it, repeatedly, at the behest of journalists and debate moderators and regular people who ask questions at town halls. He'll have to explain to America why gay marriage is the right thing to do, how it comports with the country's most fundamental values. Coming from a sitting president seeking another term, his arguments will be inherently mainstream.
That it took a while for Obama to get there, especially if you chalk up the delay to selfish political calculations he made at the cost of honest leadership, might temper the excitement. There's nothing praiseworthy about holding your finger to the wind on basic issues of human equality, if that's indeed what he's done. But the fact that the winds have shifted enough for a cautious, politically sensitive person like Obama to shift with them? That says a lot.
Transcript of Q and A with the President about DADT and Same-sex marriage [AMERICAblog]
.
I believe it. I wish he was getting close to ending his pretend presidency.
Has he snuck away to visit Larry Sinclair’s grave yet?
Because Dumbo is one of “them”. Ask Larry Sinclair and Rahm.
Larry Sinclair is dead?
I will be thrilled when the anti-American, communist former junior US Senator from Illinois finally leaves our White House for the last time. I just pray that the dreamers who voted for his learn from this dreadful experiment.
Barack Obama is already in a gay marriage.
That’s not going to set well with the muzzies.
All hell and tears to come before that.
He is a queer and everyone knows it!
“President Obama Getting Closer to Ending His Pretend Opposition to Gay Marriage”
This is Newspeak for “getting closer to revealing yet another campaign lie”.
What makes you say that?
The answer to the failure of liberalism is always...more liberalism. He will tack hard left after the election.
Yeah, I heard he offed himself.
Looked it up. Apparently he took some pills, but friends came to the rescue and he went to the emergency room and had his stomach pumped. Looks like the dude made it.
Did not know that. I hope He and Barry work things out. /s
It appears that Larry’s suicide was fake/false. He was on and off line watching folks react as he was supposedly overdosing. And he bought some websites while he was at it.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
The usurper needs to get the boot, his crimes made public, and all that he did made null and void due to the fact that he was never eligible to be President. Republicans need courage and strong conservative principles or they are the enemy as well. Compromise with evil is the very reason we are in this pit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.