don’t get me started..
We could have found a strong conservative candidate instead of O’Donnell (let’s be honest, she is an awful candidate and losing by a landslide).
Even Castle would have been better than the Marxist-D candidate (vote for Senate Majority Leader is the most important one, along with voting with conservatives 40% of votes).
Losing the control of Senate by 1 seat (because of DE disaster) may be fun for you, but I’m not amused. Nor is the country.
Who do you think would have "control of the Senate" if Castle would have won? Certainly not conservatives and probably not even Republicans. Being beat over the head with Castle's liberal votes proving "bipartisanship" also would not have been "amusing".
We should know more today. The Wilmington paper reported today that the Frankin & Marshall poll has been updated (she was behind by something like 18% last time)and the results will be reported at a presser at 11:30 this morning. We’ll see if this race has tightened as much as we all hope it has. The poll’s turnout model is suspect, but the % improvement, if any, would be relevant.
Castle would have been a disaster, he a leftwinger and this election is about electing conservatives.
He would have been seated immediately and supported cap and trade.
And there is no reason to think he would have beaten Coons, since he couldn't even beat O'Donnell.
We are going to get control of the Senate even if we lose this seat, but that isn't the real reason you Castle supporters still are whining about O'Donnell beating you (and who Castle never endorsed), you are complaining because the GOP voters are no longer going to pick just anyone with a 'R' next to their name.