Skip to comments.
Alaska Supreme Court issues stay on write-in list ban(Sen. Murkowski)
ktuu ^
| 5:40 p.m. AKDT, October 27, 2010
| News Staff
Posted on 10/27/2010 9:37:36 PM PDT by Red Steel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
1
posted on
10/27/2010 9:37:39 PM PDT
by
Red Steel
To: Red Steel
2
posted on
10/27/2010 9:38:13 PM PDT
by
Red Steel
To: Minus_The_Bear
3
posted on
10/27/2010 9:38:56 PM PDT
by
Red Steel
To: Red Steel
It isn’t complicated. If you provide a separate list of write in candidates you are providing an alternate ballot.
Can’t the scum ever play it straight, just once?
4
posted on
10/27/2010 9:42:02 PM PDT
by
IrishCatholic
(No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
To: IrishCatholic
Cant the scum ever play it straight, just once? No.
5
posted on
10/27/2010 9:44:18 PM PDT
by
Michael.SF.
(Current count of friends/family who have abandoned Obama: 11)
To: Red Steel
All kinds of shenanigans!!
6
posted on
10/27/2010 9:44:27 PM PDT
by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: Red Steel
Can't you write in anyone, or not in Alaska? If you can write in anyone, don't you need a list of all Alaskans eligible to be elected Senator?
To: Red Steel
Providing a list of write in candidates? This makes absolutely no sense.
8
posted on
10/27/2010 9:48:40 PM PDT
by
teg_76
To: teg_76
She is putting herself back on the ballot.
To: Minus_The_Bear
This is amazing.
A write-in candidate that is now on a separate ballot with her name on the ballot?
Insanity rules the day.
10
posted on
10/27/2010 9:55:27 PM PDT
by
CSI007
To: Red Steel
Sounds like this list of write-in candidates is being provided even to voters who don’t request it. They are modifying the official ballot, or issuing an amended ballot for all practical purposes.
11
posted on
10/27/2010 9:55:31 PM PDT
by
Will88
To: Red Steel
Why can’t they have the standard two-way race? what happens if all three get 33.3%? Will Senator Stuart Smalley come to the rescue?
To: Minus_The_Bear
I’m confused, are the state election workers handing out names inside the polling place? Or is it Murkowski supporters outside the polling place?
13
posted on
10/27/2010 9:58:29 PM PDT
by
teg_76
To: Red Steel
Damned Murkowski. R or D, an elitist member of the ruling class feels entitled to the seat, regardless of election law.
14
posted on
10/27/2010 10:00:15 PM PDT
by
bigbob
To: Red Steel
Many Alaskans are addicted to federal pork and Murkowski promises to slap it on thick if elected.
Unfortunately,entitlement junkies are dumber than a possum with a lobotomy.
Without the lists they couldn't SPELL Murkowski and they must write in the treacherous RINO’s name EXACTLY or the ballot is tossed.
15
posted on
10/27/2010 10:01:15 PM PDT
by
Happy Rain
("So this is how a black man leads the greatest nation in world history.")
To: teg_76
Joy Bahar should address this candidate.
16
posted on
10/27/2010 10:03:07 PM PDT
by
lonestar
To: Red Steel
If there is to be a write-in list, it should be a list of all 350,000 or so Alaskans over the age of 30.
17
posted on
10/27/2010 10:10:56 PM PDT
by
B Knotts
(Just another Tenther)
To: Red Steel
It’s amazing how much money Sen. Murkowski has to wage write in campaign of this scale. She seems to have axcess to as much money as she has little honor.
To: Happy Rain
My understanding of a previous ruling is that the write-in need not spell "Lisa Murkowski" exactly correct. They just have to make it clear enough for the election judge to identify it as a vote for Murkowski. They could put "Lisa M." or "Mezversky" or whatever they think is correct so long as the election judge believes he/she understands the voter's intent.
IMO, the whole debate is one whether to *remind* voters of Murkowski as they are stepping into the voting booth as opposed to forcing the voter to remember this on their own.
In Texas, I have seen lists of write-in candidates who qualified as such by turning in petitions with enough names to be write-ins yet not enough names to be included on the official ballot. This is normally the province of fringe candidates who tend to get only a minimal number of votes.
19
posted on
10/27/2010 10:49:23 PM PDT
by
OrangeHoof
(Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
To: Minus_The_Bear
She is putting herself back on the ballot.Very astute observation. I think you have it correct with that one.
20
posted on
10/27/2010 10:53:45 PM PDT
by
gunsequalfreedom
(Conservative is not a label of convenience.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson