Posted on 10/27/2010 6:49:55 PM PDT by djsmith
Check out this open letter to Rush and his listeners from the guys at Hillbuzz. They have seen the current Dems for what they are.
http://hillbuzz.org/2010/10/27/an-open-letter-to-rush-limbaugh-and-his-listeners/
Excellent comments!!!
Now if all these democrats are really turned of to liberalism
it would be great. But if the author of the article couldn’t see the leftist & amoral aspect of Hillary I don’t see all the anti Obama talk as meaning much.
Appreciate your thoughts, ken. I am wondering if she stays put for the time being, keeping a foot (and ear) in the door of the current administration. When she bails it’s a freefall ...
I think you are correct the Bill will do the dirty work, as exhibited on the campaign trail.
Yes, we can hope that they now understand that redistributionist, Marxist economics leads to high structural unemployment, lower standard of living, nationalization of industry, loss of personal freedom, and the loss of sovereignty of the United States. But that’s not what the letter said. They want to bring down the RAT Party. Okay, good.
But perhaps what they really want is to do is SAVE the DemonRat Party by bringing down the Kenyan—and substituting HILLARY! at the top of the ticket in 2012. The CENTRIST, Hillary! The Jacksonian Clintons. Middle America! Yeah, right. We know that the Clinton Crime Syndicate is already at work to accomplish this.
Why is Hillary in Asia for 2 weeks? She’s laying low while Obama take the hit from the TIDAL WAVE MIDTERMS.
They're probably trying to construct the perfect exit scenario now..so she gets out looking good..without seeming to abandon the country and the president and the party..It's a fine line, but they can pull it off..
On the campaign trail Bill is coordinating with Biden, which cannot help the climate of WH paranoia.
I think the next couple of weeks will prove interesting, with BO and HC on their separate Asian tours.
Woooooooooo
Rush is talking about this now !
It’s already gonna go viral .. bet on it.
http://v4.player.abacast.com/player/player.php?pid=1187
I missed the beginning of how he began the topic.
If anyone would please, I’d appreciate knowing.
Bill Clinton’s ‘retribution tour’ against Barack Obama
@@@
Byron York wonders here whether Bill Clinton wants Democrats to win next Tuesday. That may be going too far but he is certainly onto something when he suggests that (the) Clinton(s) has/have (politically speaking, theyre inseparable) a double agenda right now.
As I reported a couple of weeks ago, Bill himself has stated that his principal motivation for going on the campaign trail was to thank those who had supported his wife against Obama.
After my column was published, the NYT did a big piece on Bill on the campaign trail and buried the stuff about Clinton not being close to Obama and in reality still campaigning for Hillary. But it was still in there:
Still, Mr. Clinton is not particularly close to Mr. Obama.
He coordinates with Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., but makes his own decisions about whom to help.
He has focused on aiding Democrats who endorsed Mrs. Clinton against Mr. Obama, like Representative Mark Schauer here in Battle Creek. Some Democrats call it a retribution tour; aides said they think of it as a thank you tour.
Deep in The Washington Posts Bill-on-the-stump piece (published three days before the NYT effort) was the notion that Clinton is essentially going rogue:
Rest here
Wow! This election is going to be a rat bloodbath!
Why Sarah Palin is right for America and why Hillary! is wrong for America."
Well, they're part way there. Try this: "The reason so many of us support Governor Palin is not just because we see the same Alinksy assaults being waged upon her but the woman is pitch-perfect in outlining exactly why Obama and the Left are wrong, and why Democrats under Obama are dangerous to have in elected office."
Now they are still a bit deluded about HRC, but at least they aren't looking to back her in 2012: "I know you talk about a 'Hillary'; but Rush, as much as I love Hillary Clinton, and as much as I worked my heart out for her in 2008, theres no way that even she can repair the damage Obama has done to the party. Certainly not by 2012."
Doesn’t it make your shriveled conservative heart go all pitter patter?? LOL
“How he began the topic” He said he got so many emails on it, he decided to address it.
Also, in case you missed it, Rush also discussed this article at length -— said he wished he had written it himself.
A Referendum on the Redeemer (Barack Obama)
Wall Street Journal ^ | 10-27-10 | Shelby Steele
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2616419/posts
Great! LOL!
Thank you!!!
I made this gif showing a PUMA pouncing on Obama during the campaign for President. Not sure if I even used it much, lol.
They probably won’t vote for Republicans or Conservatives (though the author of that piece admits he “outed himself as a conservative” which imho undermines his entire article), those are the people who are going to be sitting this election cycle out, and hopefully giving the GOP 100 house seats.
OK I said hopefully. I’ll take 50, be happy with 70, and hope for 100.
Yuck, Andrew Sullivan. What a vile man he turned out to be. Haven't heard anything from him in a very long time--hope it stays that way.
They still live...in larger proportions. ;o)
Wow!
Well, that’s one way of looking at it.
In my little own world, the Rep candidate was chosen for me. So, in protest of that candidate...and loving his VP pick for whom I voted in the general election...I registered as a dem, and voted for Hillary.
However, within a week, I changed my party registration back to “unaffiliated”.
It was too creepy, otherwise.
LOL!
Great graphic! I wish you had used it more recently.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.