Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Springfield Reformer
I don’t see what all the fuss is about. “Enemy” is a rather elastic term.

Not only that, but the saying itself is rather old. For example, it shows up in this aticle from 1829.

Hell, I've even seen FReepers use the term.

What's reallyamusing, is how quickly folks have gotten hysterical about the old saying. Tells me a lot more about them, than it does about Obama.

63 posted on 10/27/2010 1:41:00 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb

Well, yes, it was used, but as the article you cited pointed out, it was almost as controversial then as it is now, coming in the shadow of the recent civil war. What strikes me is the expression “vindictive passions,” and the corollary fear that Jackson would be the president of a party not a country. That is what resonates with the current flap, and while FReepers may reasonably be expected to use a term like “enemy” with near reckless abandon, I think we have a right to expect our President to represent, whether in word or deed, the country as a whole, and not just a party. That thought alone, were he to practice internalizing it daily in front of his mirror, would greatly reduce his exposure to ridicule.


64 posted on 10/27/2010 3:31:12 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson