“There was no reason for her to be physically assaulted like that.”
According to your reasoning, she should be allowed to rush up to the President without interference. Are you cool with that?
I just went to YouTube to review the video. What I saw yesterday appeared to have been edited to show the man stepping on her twice, and at first glance, it appeared that he was stepping on her head.
Once I watched the video 4 or 5 times, I realized that she had not been "stomped on the head" as the msm claims, but the guy had stepped on her shoulder, helping to keep her on the ground.
Still, the msm is going to be having a field day with this. That awful Ted Knight impersonator was already putting this on the front burner last night, and I'm sure that it will stay there at least through the election, and probably into the next few election cycles as well.
Oops. Getting back to my original point, I felt that she had been assaulted AFTER the threat posed by her had been averted. After repeated viewings of the footage on YouTube, I changed my mind about the "assault."