In an appearance on the Bill Press radio show, PP president Cecile Richards said that, although the costs of the federal health care bill already promise to skyrocket out of control, federal officials ought to consider covering birth control a priority because of the "cost savings" benefit of fewer children being born. How long before she openly advocates just killing the "worthless eaters"?
1 posted on
10/26/2010 4:13:36 PM PDT by
wagglebee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser
Pro-Life Ping
2 posted on
10/26/2010 4:14:21 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; Amos the Prophet; ...
3 posted on
10/26/2010 4:15:08 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
This is incredibly disturbing.
4 posted on
10/26/2010 4:18:55 PM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: wagglebee
Cecile Richards tells us that fewer people is a better condition for the rest of us.
I strongly encourage her to show us the way by jumping from a tall building or something.
We can judge if our lives have improved through her death (and I'd almost bet they will ~ in this one special case).
5 posted on
10/26/2010 4:20:08 PM PDT by
muawiyah
("GIT OUT THE WAY" The Republicans are coming)
To: wagglebee
FEWER PEOPLE IN THE GOV'T MEANS LESS GOV'T COST!!!
7 posted on
10/26/2010 4:24:33 PM PDT by
CommieCutter
(A Centrist Democrat is now defined as: between Socialism and Communism.)
To: wagglebee
8 posted on
10/26/2010 4:28:06 PM PDT by
tiki
To: wagglebee
I’m sure she wants to deport all the Illegals????
To: wagglebee
I would argue the opposite. More people in a 1st world, modern environment means more productivity, more consumers of goods, more wage earners, more tax revenues and a benefit to us all. With new technologies we pollute less, can have a smaller environmental footprint and “be fruitful and multiply” as the Good Lord instructed us.
For years the God/People hating elitists have said we have to have less people (always US, never THEM) and man is a scourge on the planet.
God made the Earth for us and us for the Earth. He gave us a very intelligent mind to be creative and not wasteful. If only our souls were as good!
10 posted on
10/26/2010 4:29:26 PM PDT by
Alas Babylon!
(Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must-like men-undergo the fatigue of supporting it)
To: wagglebee
Human extinction would also lower government costs.
These population control freaks are insane.
To: wagglebee
Ms. Richards is espousing the ANTI-HUMAN world view shared by most liberals. People, human beings, are an ugly, defective race who always take more than they give, create nothing of beauty or value, and need to be eliminated.
This is the mindset that justifies the murders of tens of millions, hundreds of millions, in the name of the common good and the making of a better mankind.
Keep it in mind whenever you hear them speak, tell yourselves over and over, ANTI-HUMAN, ANTI-HUMAN, ANTI-HUMAN...
To: wagglebee
But that means less wealth created and less tax revenue.
But if she insists on less people, she can start with herself.
14 posted on
10/26/2010 4:49:57 PM PDT by
rbosque
(11 year Freeper! Combat Economist.)
To: wagglebee
It’s obvious from looking at her. She is one of them, an alien. Not the kind from Mexico, either. Her fellow kind have infested the gov’t just like the stink bugs in the eastern US. I’ll bet under that perfectly symmetrical exterior she is filled with bug like creatures. Time to call the Men in Black.
And not Obama, since he is only half black.
To: wagglebee
Given where and how PP operates, Richards really meant that fewer black people mean less government cost. Racist scumbags.
19 posted on
10/26/2010 5:19:54 PM PDT by
Mr. Silverback
(Anyone who says we need illegals to do the jobs Americans won't do has never watched "Dirty Jobs.")
To: wagglebee
I have no problem with contraception. Sometimes it takes total sense. I personally went the route of making sure that my wife and I would have no children, not even a possibility of any. Shortly before getting married I had a vasectomy. And some 39 years later, there have been none.
It worked.
To: wagglebee
If they eliminated welfare, a lot fewer children would be born into poverty. They could eliminate scores of govt welfare workers. If they also eliminated planned parenthood funding, perhaps people would be encouraged to learn to live more responsibly.
26 posted on
10/26/2010 6:05:25 PM PDT by
Waryone
(RINOs, Elites, and Socialists - on the endangered list, soon to become extinct.)
To: wagglebee
As the economy worsens, the call for the killing of the feeble and costly, young and old, will become louder and louder.
Lord have mercy.
27 posted on
10/26/2010 6:20:10 PM PDT by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: wagglebee
Next stop on this train to hell is Soylent Green.
29 posted on
10/26/2010 6:52:30 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
To: wagglebee
Only if you assume that all additional people will be non-productive. Otherwise, additional productive people will pay more taxes.
31 posted on
10/26/2010 7:31:16 PM PDT by
reg45
To: wagglebee
To “H” with PP less, or elimination of Liberals/Leftists in government will reduce costs of government extraordinarily.
32 posted on
10/26/2010 7:49:15 PM PDT by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: wagglebee
The president of Planned Parenthood has argued that the new federal health care reform ought to consider funding all contraception with taxpayer dollars because preventing new children leads to less government expense.She has it exactly backwards. The people are not a cost to the government; the government is a cost to the people.
And we need to drastically cut that cost, before it drowns us in a tsunami of debt and oppression (and I pray that is still possible).
33 posted on
10/26/2010 10:05:45 PM PDT by
Maceman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson