[ConservaTexan]

I’d be embarrassed if I had spent last night and this morning defending Cao. Multiple sources provided, take your pick. Thanks, stg!

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/124777-cao-says-hed-weight-pelosi-and-boehner-equally-for-speaker

http://weaselzippers.us/2010/10/19/rino-rep-joseph-cao-says-hed-consider-pelosi-for-house-speaker/

http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1010/Cao_could_go_either_way_on_speaker_vote.html?showall

[SeeSac]

I’d be embarrassed if I had spent last night and this morning defending Cao.

Not as embarrassed as you should be defending picking a corrupt democrat over Cao.

[CajunConservative]

You don’t get it though. There are only two choices in this election. It’s either Cao who will vote most of the time with the conservative position or it’s a crooked and corrupt marxist Black Congressional Caucus democrat who will never vote with conservatives.

It’s not about defending Cao as much as it’s understanding REALITY.

And NO I’m not embarrassed because unlike you I understand that in some areas candidates like Cao is the best that we can ever hope to get due to the demographics. The CBC pushes a whole lot of the marxist policies because they are usually 100% guaranteed reelection until they die or are prosecuted for their crimes and corruption, ie Rangell, Waters, Dingell, Conyers and one of your state’s representatives, Sheila Jackson Lee.