To: originalbuckeye
The sad part is she apparently didn’t even mean to do it.
4 posted on
10/25/2010 4:33:23 PM PDT by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
To: RichInOC
Wonder if the machine itself was so archaic that it was not as simple as flipping an electrical switch, that it had to be manually “primed” or sumfin.
9 posted on
10/25/2010 4:36:32 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: RichInOC; HiTech RedNeck
The sad part is she apparently didn’t even mean to do it. "Never attribute to malice what can easily be explained by stupidity."
Looks like incompetence/stupidity from the article info.
24 posted on
10/25/2010 6:29:49 PM PDT by
Tainan
(Cogito, ergo conservatus - Domari Nolo)
To: RichInOC
There was another article posted yesterday that contained more information. In that article, the nurse turned off the support machine, at which time an alarm sounded. She then tried to turn it back on.
If this is correct, it appears that her action to terminate life support was deliberate.
33 posted on
10/26/2010 5:33:42 AM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson