Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
Critics at the time thought the 13 states were too big to form one republic. That republicanism doesn't work over so large an extant.

What gets all the press today is how supposedly deeply divided we are and how entrenched in our views. Granted, it's often an agenda-driven effort as the solution usually seems to be that conservatives need to roll over on their backs and piddle on themselves, and it's especially seen when conservatives are perceived to have an advantage. When liberals are cleaning out the store, such complaints aren't seen so much. But my point being that saying there is an irreconcilable divide is to say we're too diverse to be served by one policy, which either means we ARE too big for one government, or at least that more of the feds power needs to be devolved back to the states.

4 posted on 10/25/2010 8:37:33 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Still Thinking

Good point. It’s perfectly fine for the states to be deeply divided on domestic issues, if federalism is working. The equal protection clause changed that.


8 posted on 10/25/2010 7:55:08 PM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson